Weather Magnet

News
Print this story  |  Email this story  |  [+] Text Size [-]  

Wild horse legislation ignites debate



ONTARIO — Legislation in Congress to deliver more protection to wild horses is furnishing heart burn to ranchers and people within the federal agency charged with managing the wild mounts.

Those concerns revolve chiefly around the potential impact of the wild animals on public lands.

Secretary of Interior Ken Salazar is pushing the new protection mandate — dubbed the Restore Our American Mustangs Act — for wild horses.

“The wild horse issue is really just one of the issues agriculture — livestock grazing on public lands, specifically — has to face today as we have to deal with a general public that is totally disconnected from reality when it comes to food production and resource use (or abuse),” Jordan Valley area rancher Bob Skinner said via E-mail.

Speaking to the Malheur Cattlemen’s Association Renee Straub, Vale District of the United States Bureau of Land Management, said the Restore Our American Mustangs Act would restrict destruction of horses to terminal animals and allow the animals to expand beyond their management areas. Also, people who adopt the horses would not be able to own them, making it more difficult to get adoptions.

According to BLM’s latest figures, there about 33,000 wild horses out on the range in 10 western states, and more than 30,000 horses in holding pens. The agency spends about $100,000 per day caring for the horses in holding pens.

In testimony before a United States House of Representatives subcommittee last spring, Ed Roberson, BLM assistant director of Renewable Resources and Planning, said, “Herd populations have consistently exceeded appropriate management levels. Herd populations in the 1970s and 1980s surpassed 64,000 animals, more than twice what the rangelands could sustain.”

In his testimony, given in March, Roberson said the appropriate management level on the range is about 2,200 animals, and the estimated population of wild horses and burros was at 34,000.

“Because wild horses and burrows have virtually no natural predators, their herd sizes can double about ever four years,” he said.

According to Legislative Digest, the bill would authorize the government to acquire new rangelands through the purchase of grazing buyouts, land acquisitions or exchanges, conservation easements and agreements with private landowners.

The bill also requires research and implementation of new surgical sterilization to reduce reproductive rates of wild horses and burros, plus more aggressive marketing to get more horses adopted.

A key element in Secretary Salazar’s proposal is to create a new set of wild horse preserves across the nation, populating them with non-reproducing horses.

The idea is still not popular with some ranchers.

“It’s an exercise in futility,” Mike Hanley, Jordan Valley rancher said, during last week’s cattlemen’s meeting in Ontario. “There is no end in sight.”

While the bill — H.R. 1018 — has passed the House, it has not passed in the Senate, according to Malheur County Judge Dan Joyce.

Wild horses can be destructive to rangeland if not properly managed, he said.

“They can just decimate a field. They eat it right to the dirt,” Joyce said. Skinner said the impact from damage sparked by the wild mounts can hit the pocketbook of residents.

“The cost to the taxpayer is horrendous,” Skinner said. “The resource abuse is an issue, unadoptable horses are becoming more of an issue, not enough holding facilities — the list goes on,” he said. “There are no easy answers especially in the light of the fact that wild horses are such an emotional subject with so many people. People are emotional on both sides of the issue.”




Comment Blog - Note: All Comments Subject To Approval

spc wrote on Nov 21, 2009 8:48 PM:

" Barbara in ky could you please explain this...
Welfare ranchers are subsidized with a half billion of taxpayers dollars and only supply about 2-3% of the beef . Farmers supply the rest and pay for the land and feed.

I grew up on a cattle ranch Or maybe it was a cattle farm. I'm not really sure I just know that we grow cows there, I also know some farmers. They grow things like potatoes or onions and some of them have cattle as well, could you please explain the difference. I would really like to hear your explanation.

Also concerning the rancher welfare not sure where that comes from, but I'm sure if it was available , somebody around here would've signed up for it by now "

crazyhorse wrote on Nov 16, 2009 8:45 AM:

" There are 257 million acres of rangeland in the western states which supports 8.6 million cows and calves for a month (for $1.35), yet it can only support 2,200 horses? Why will the BLM not allow conservation groups to outbid cattlemen to allow overgrazed lands to recover? BLM grazing permits cost the taxpayers over $40 million last year over the fees collected. It is hard to understand why the public should be forced to subsidized the cattle industry while they return the favor by damaging public lands. The agriculture industry is the largest recipient of welfare in the US. "

Meat Lover wrote on Nov 15, 2009 6:51 PM:

" I think we should round them all up.........and EAT them...........yummy!!! "

arf_arf wrote on Nov 15, 2009 6:22 PM:

" The Spanish brought horses over here you dolts! They are an invasive species just like we are. "

doro lohmann wrote on Nov 13, 2009 6:19 PM:

" very nice, one-sided and under- educated article.
I guess it does work in some people's interest that horses only have "silent voices". As long as we are concerned with who has done wrong we will remain far away from ever finding our way through this.
We, as a self- declared species of intelligence have miserably failed!
Some people's comments are simply shameful but do explain how we got here in the first place.
Get a grip, people! And get over yourselves! there is enough room for all of us if we can figure out how to give instead of take. "

RAR wrote on Nov 13, 2009 2:10 PM:

" Instead of worrying about a few thousand wild horses that have been here long before the European invasion, let's remove the millions of non-native species destroying the West - European Angus, Herefords, sheep, etc. "

To Voice wrote on Nov 13, 2009 1:43 PM:

" I know you mean well and truly belive most of what you feel, but for some areas of the very southwest these horses are not from "old wild herds".

The western U.S. is filled with horse herds that came from ranches turning out their teams that were used for haying,(please remember that all transportation was with horses) and other team needs during the winters when there was open range. The horses, left to their own grew in numbers and not all of them were needed the next year. When tractors and trucks came to be the need for alot of those horses also came to an end. They shoiuld have been delt with at that time but sadly they were not and now we all have the problem. But to say all horses on BLM managed land are some kind of "wild" horse that has always been there is not true. "

donald wrote on Nov 13, 2009 11:04 AM:

" These horses are protected by law just like grizzly bear, eagles, and the like. We have laws that were past and there is a reason why. Your going to find out how many people love these horses and why, they are honest horses, I like that word honest,and the ranchers are about to be put off rancher welfare. "

hmm wrote on Nov 13, 2009 10:07 AM:

" To A Voice...
Leave emotion out of it? Just WHERE did the so called "Wild Horse" come from? Horses were extinct in North America before the Spaniards and Colonists brought them over. The so called "wild horses" are no more than horses released when there was no further need for them at the advent of mechanized equipment and travel. I have horses and guess what... They become "wild" the moment I release them, whether it be on their 450 acre summer pasture or in the winter dry lot. I could turn them loose just about anywhere and they would find food and a way to exist. My horses actually have a job thus a reason to exist. The wild horses are no more than cast-offs. People are turning loose these "icons of the American West" every day to become "free/wild" Deer and elk are wild, wolves are wild, Zebras are wild, Horses/Mustangs are not. Not having natural predators and left unchecked they will breed indiscriminately and then what? Who will be responsible or them then? It was our grandparents/great -grandparents who released the original ones in the first place. Sure the Native Americans stole or captured unattended ones and tamed them for various reasons including for food, but who actually does that anymore? NO ONE you know why? Because people like you think they all need to be free!!! We all know "Freedom comes with a price"... "

Barbara in KY wrote on Nov 13, 2009 4:02 AM:

" This article is so full if bull it's pathetic. The millions of cattle --not wild horses--have damaged the range and riparian areas as proven by a Government Accounting Office study done in 1990. Welfare ranchers are subsidized with a half billion of taxpayers dollars and only supply about 2-3% of the beef . Farmers supply the rest and pay for the land and feed. Only when a horse has nothing else to eat and is fenced in will it eat all the grass. Wild horses naturally roam and are symbiotic to the ecology and help the land and other wildlife. They are also a re-introduced native species. Nature was in balance before greed destroyed it. "

MJ Wilson wrote on Nov 12, 2009 5:50 PM:

" Watch the last Cloud segment, it shows how one cougar can kill all foals in one summer. Leave them alone and let nature take it's course. Give them back the 20 million acres you took from them to give to the cattlemen who use our tax dollars to run their cattle on our horses and burro's lands. Only 3% of all the cattle using our public lands stay here, the rest goes overseas. So we're paying boocoo bucks to supply the foreigners meat, while our wild horses and burro's are demonized so that they can kill them. 64,000 horses against 7.5 million cattle, who's over-grazing??? "

A Voice For The Horses wrote on Nov 12, 2009 1:44 PM:

" This isn't just about the abuse of wild horses and the twenty million acres stolen from them, or the millions of taxpayer dollars now doing what the horses did for themselves, before, and for free: housed themselves, and found their own food, nor is it just about the fact that the horses' (by law!) prime rangeland has been fenced off from them, along with their watering holes, so millions and millions and millions and MILLIONS of privately-owned cattle can graze on PUBLIC lands.

Overall, this is about GREED. The wild horses suffer because of GREED.

To the cattlemen, oil drillers, and all others who want to make money off the HORSES' LANDS: the land IS NOT YOURS, unless you're a wild horse. You need to give back what you stole, and if you have no honor, you need to be STOPPED from stealing it in the first place. If this takes an act of law, so be it.

A thief complains he can't making a living if he's forced to stop stealing? Are you kidding me?

The truth about the horses is spreading like wildfire -- we'll make sure you stop breaking the law and are barred from harassing, abusing, rounding-up, imprisoning and slaughtering America's wild horses, BLM, and that the cattlemen are stopped from stealing the horses' lands.

The horses have a voice, and it's the outraged voice of the American people.
Let's leave emotion out of it, and stick to the law. Enough is enough. "

WHY wrote on Nov 12, 2009 12:13 PM:

" Why do we have or need wild horses? Sounds to me like they are one huge problem for the ranchers/farmers and our tax dollars are being used to take care of them, WHY??? I think a hunting season on them is in line.... No different than the wolves. "


TERMS OF USE

Those who post comments are accountable for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they furnish. While we encourage writers to utilize this service on our Web site, we also strongly suggest they treat it as public forum where good taste counts. We reserve the right to decline for approval objectionable material from these blogs.

Writers that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments - such as racists language, threats or comments unrelated to the story - will not be approved for the blogs. Also, entries that are unsigned or "signatures" by someone other than the actual writer will not be approved.

While writers can still post anonymously, we strongly suggest that they do not do so.

Opinions, guidance and other information expressed in Argus Observer story blog comments and on the Argus Observer blogs represent the individuals' own views and not necessarily those of the Argus Observer. The Argus Observer furnishes this type of forum and does not endorse and is not accountable for statements or advice from anyone other than an designated Argus Observer spokesperson.


(optional)
   

All Newspaper Ads
Place a classified ad

Community Calendar
February 2010
S M Tu W Th F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28

» This Week's Events
» Submit an Event
Click to View All Events

Business Directory
Find a business near you
Business Type

OR Business Name

Web Search
Google
 

Find out about our RSS feeds and what they are.

Copyright © 2010 Argus Observer - www.argusobserver.com. All rights reserved. | Unathorized reproduction is prohibited.