Weather Magnet

News
Print this story  |  Email this story  |  [+] Text Size [-]  

Running out of room



Ontario Police Department Capt. Mark Alexander stands in a crowded office at the police station Friday afternoon. The Ontario Police Department has run out of space but any plans to build a new police facility are in limbo because of a lack of city funds.
Ontario— The Ontario Police Department is running out of room.

In fact, the department’s priority-based workload has consumed more square feet every year, and, so far, there does not appear to be any relief on the horizon.

Not that the city’s elected leaders and top police officials do not agree on the need for a larger police department.

At least two elected leaders accede the department is out of space.

But the real question revolves, as always, around a single key theme: money.

And the city doesn’t have enough of it to build a new station.

At least not yet.

“I see the need. But I also see the need not to increase taxes right now,” Ontario Mayor Joe Dominick said.

Dominick said just one glance at the cramped facilities at the Ontario Police Department tells the story.

Ontario City Council Ron Verini confirmed the department’s facilities are way too small for the kind of work police must do now.

“It is absolutely packed. We don’t have proper holding facilities. It is just cramped. Chief (Mike) Kee’s office isn’t even on the same floor,” Verini said.

Kee conceded his department needs more room, but he also admitted he has no clear idea — based on the current economic situation — how to find cash for a new building.

One thing he is sure of, he said, is the need to keep the dialogue between residents, elected officials and the police regarding a new station going strong.

“We have that (a new police station) in the budget as an unfunded need. But we can’t let it drop off the radar screen. I know we don’t have enough money to build a police department, but that doesn’t mean we can’t keep talking about it,” he said.

Potential risks

Cramped quarters at the police department are not only a problem for the officers charged with protecting the community but also contribute to other troubling factors.

For example, Kee said, there are problems regarding the separation of juveniles and adult offenders because of the lack of space at the station.

“You’ve got to have juveniles who are detained not only out of sight of adults who are detained but out of hearing range,” Kee said.

Kee said the potential legal ramifications of such limited choices regarding where to house juveniles and adults is worrisome.

“The thing that worries me the most, and this will happen, is we are going to meet in the hallway with some intoxicated adult who is screaming a blue streak with a 13- year-old female runaway. That is not a good thing to subject a 13-year-old runaway to. Her mom and dad are not going to be happy about that, and they could punish the city for it,” he said.

Verini said he is aware of that potential problem and believes it is an issue the City Council must ponder carefully.

“It is not really an environment that is safe, I think, for our citizens,” he said.

The department currently operates within 1,500 square feet. That space, though, is tight, Kee said.

“That’s all of our report-writing room, break room, our prisoner-holding room, interview room, that’s everything. Our evidence room is not even attached to our police department,” he said.

In another distressing issue related to outdated facilities, Kee said the fact his officers cannot park their police vehicles in a secure location often leads to vandalism.

“Bricks through windshields. We’ve had cars keyed, tires slashed,” Kee said. Seemingly small items make a big difference, Kee said.

“Say we have a vehicle that is involved in a serious crime. We need a compound, an impound lot, where we can go inside and examine a vehicle,” he said.

Kee said Ontario has outgrown its police department facility.

“Our needs have changed. For example, when this was built, we did not even have computers. We have five computers now, and all of the officers share them. We are out of space for lockers,” he said.

Kee said, while money for a new station is clearly the key factor in any future plans, he believes it is critical that the debate continues.

Creating coalitions between agencies to share costs for a new facility may be a good way to go, Kee said.

“Let’s find out what we need. We have an old master plan. We have an idea on square footage. And we know there are partners out there with much the same mission as us,” he said.

Dominick said, until the economy improves, going to voters to foot the bill for a new police station simply is not in the cards.

He said, however, there are other methods, such as grants or federal stimulus money that may be viable alternatives.

“I believe it is something for the future. When I went to the League of Oregon Cities meeting, we found out the Ford Foundation does have public safety grants, and we are pursing that, looking into whether we qualify,” he said.

Pat Caldwell is the editor of the Argus Observer. He can be contacted at PatC@argusobserver.com.




Comment Blog - Note: All Comments Subject To Approval

Larry wrote on Oct 28, 2009 9:02 AM:

" it was shut down only once and continues to be so by Ontario's Mayor. Pretty good propaganda campaign huh Joe "

The Social Security wrote on Oct 27, 2009 4:14 PM:

" building is out of the question in my opinion. Although a great location and a nice building, this property is owned by the same loose who allowed the Moore to be torched, made us look at a hole for how many months,and then turned it over to the city to take care of under the stipulation it reverts back to him if the property sells!

He won't even donate fertilizer.

This person has also been convicted of HUD fraud.

No way does he deserve anymore city money! "

A wrote on Oct 27, 2009 1:17 PM:

" "This would be a good time to maybe look again at the 1% to have our non-Ontario brethren help us out a bit."


There is a reason that idea has been shut down more than once...IT'S A TERRIBLE IDEA. It will never pass, and if for some crazy reason it does, you will watch this town crumble faster than it already is.


Yeah, why not use the SS building for something other than an eye sore once it is vacant? Why spend money we don't have on something we don't need?


Once I start seeing the rattle can art thats on every building in town getting cleaned up and the police charging after gang members instead of speeders, then I might open my wallet to help them out more often. "

Wishin wrote on Oct 27, 2009 12:30 PM:

" FYI.....Buying a car in Oregon doesn't keep an Idaho resident from having to pay sales tax on the vehicle. The first time you register it in Idaho you must have a bill of sale showing the price, which you then pay sales tax on.....

Sadly, if the citizens of Ontario want to shop and have any kind of selection, they HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO GO TO IDAHO to shop, there is nothing in Ontario except for Wal-Mart, K-Mart, Bi-Mart. We are the "Three Mart" town, how very sad...No WinCo, no Fred Meyer, No Costco, No JC Penny, no Macy's, No Sears store (just catalog sales), no ShopKo, no Olive Garden, No Fridays, No real Steak house, BUT, if'n all ya want is pizza, hamburgers, Mexican food and uneatable chinese food, then by all means come to Ontario, it's just the place for you........I plan my shopping in Nampa, Caldwell or Boise and make a day of it, shop and have lunch or dinner at a REAL resturant..Yummmm. Ontario never used to be this way in years past, I keep hoping it will once again rejoin the world and start moving ahead instead of regressing.....

You want to charge people a 1% tax to shop in Ontario, you best have places for them to shop or they still head East. "

realist wrote on Oct 27, 2009 12:12 PM:

" You won't have to worry about having enough room, the way Ontario is dying. They need to utilize the space they have, and that includes the Fire department. What do they need a new building for when most of the buildings in Ontario are empty or soon will be. "

To ya uh huh wrote on Oct 27, 2009 12:01 PM:

" What are you talking about. I said nothing about owning a business. I work at Oreida on a production line. I have been in this town a long time and unlike you I pay attettion. Dont dare me, because I have already moved to fruitland, and could care less about some idiot like you. "

yeah uh huh wrote on Oct 26, 2009 2:12 PM:

" Hey maybe. Threaten all you want but I don't think you will take your business to Idaho. Go ahead I dare you "

Just A Thought wrote on Oct 26, 2009 6:33 AM:

" Here is a prime example of what I stated earlier about existing buildings......Isn't the old Social Security Building now empty? Why not look into utalizing this existing building for City offices and functions? True, it is out of the "Main Stream" but an empty "existing" building none the less. Since the City officials, other than the police chief and fire chief don't have to respond to life and death emergencies, being a little off the beaten path shouldn't cause any major problem....Just sayin'.... "

Hey maybe wrote on Oct 23, 2009 12:20 PM:

" The reason that people come to this place is because of no sales tax. Do you just not get that. Im not talking just about food. Home depot, car sales, and the list goes on. Go ahead pass it but bring your shovel, because you are digging your own grave. "

Maybe a tax wrote on Oct 21, 2009 2:15 PM:

" This would be a good time to maybe look again at the 1% to have our non-Ontario brethren help us out a bit. After all, they use these services almost as much as Ontario residents do. We could give Ontario homeowners (people who actually live in Ontario) a rebate on their city property taxes to offset the sales tax. "

Hmmmm wrote on Oct 20, 2009 6:55 AM:

" All anyone thinks about is "NEW," why not look at some empty existing buildings to see what can be done? Leave the fire department where it is, in a CENTERAL LOCATION within the City where the responding Fire/Rescue can get to either end of the city quickly? Move the City Hall functions elsewhere....Use some locgic and common sense for a change.... "

Just A Thought wrote on Oct 18, 2009 10:20 AM:

" One possible idea/solution could be moving the city offices to another location. There are many empty buildings just waiting for new occupants.

Has anyone looked at the current buildings strucural plans to see if in fact when it was built in or around 1977/1978 that it was actually designed to handle the addition of a third floor as was stated at that time, or was the city taken for a ride? The two holding cells could never be used, even when the building was brand new, it seems the ventalation system could be accessed from the cells AND the hinges on the cell doors were accessible from inside the cells, oops.

The fact that Chief Kee's office is on another floor is not a big issue. At the time city hall was constructed and occupied, Chief Jones and Capt Howes offices were on the second floor and didn't create any type of hardship.

Perhaps if someone is willing to go looking, there may be some type of grant money available that would at least allow for moving city offices and remodeling the current building, instead of just abandoning it for a new one. Just a thought "

Larry wrote on Oct 18, 2009 7:02 AM:

" Hey Joe!

How bout that revenue committee recommendation? You can ignore it all you want but it only makes you look good while passing the problem to the next Mayor.

How bout it? Quit worrying about ticking off the non voters and your "buddies" and make a decision that has long term benefits or are you too busy harassing Vernini? "


TERMS OF USE

Those who post comments are accountable for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they furnish. While we encourage writers to utilize this service on our Web site, we also strongly suggest they treat it as public forum where good taste counts. We reserve the right to decline for approval objectionable material from these blogs.

Writers that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments - such as racists language, threats or comments unrelated to the story - will not be approved for the blogs. Also, entries that are unsigned or "signatures" by someone other than the actual writer will not be approved.

While writers can still post anonymously, we strongly suggest that they do not do so.

Opinions, guidance and other information expressed in Argus Observer story blog comments and on the Argus Observer blogs represent the individuals' own views and not necessarily those of the Argus Observer. The Argus Observer furnishes this type of forum and does not endorse and is not accountable for statements or advice from anyone other than an designated Argus Observer spokesperson.


(optional)
   

All Newspaper Ads
Place a classified ad

Community Calendar
February 2010
S M Tu W Th F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28

» This Week's Events
» Submit an Event
Click to View All Events

Business Directory
Find a business near you
Business Type

OR Business Name

Web Search
Google
 

Find out about our RSS feeds and what they are.

Copyright © 2010 Argus Observer - www.argusobserver.com. All rights reserved. | Unathorized reproduction is prohibited.