The Argus Observer | Online

Comment Blog - Note: All Comments Subject To Approval

F-TOWN wrote on Oct 15, 2009 8:42 AM:

" you may love to hear that fruitland lost but that doesnt really matter... what matters is that those guys worked their butts off for a good game. garnted some of them get really big headed but they deserve to... they are the best in the SRV so they have a right and one loss to an out of league team shouldnt matter either... we will see who loses when districts come around :) "

Uhaul. wrote on Oct 11, 2009 10:56 AM:

" Now all those football trendsetters parents will want to emigrate to Baker City! "

2009 wrote on Oct 7, 2009 9:38 PM:

" It's great to see local teams competing so vigorously. And, win or lose, "Anonymous," when Fruitland plays, it's never a disappointment. "

crazy horse wrote on Oct 7, 2009 7:56 AM:

" Really? I guess I can understand your bitterness. When you're not the lead dog, the view never changes..... "

anonymous wrote on Oct 4, 2009 3:06 PM:

" i always love to hear fruitland lost. "

wrote on Oct 3, 2009 10:48 PM:

" we need a time machine "

Are you kidding me wrote on Oct 3, 2009 7:04 PM:

" I'm sure this was written quickly and isn't indicative of Scott's best work (or maybe it is), but this shoddy work is undermining the legacy of what once was a great sports section.
For instance, "quartrers" is spelled wrong. A simple click of spellcheck would have eliminated that. Last I check "fieldgoal" should actually be "field goal," and, if you want to be technical, with unit on the backside it should be field-goal unit. I see that we have end zone spelled two different ways in the story and I wasn't aware Fruitland changed its name to Fruitlands. Was it supposed to be Fruitland's?
I know the Argus has a new publisher, so please John Dillon do something to fix this and return some credibility to this section and to the paper as a whole. I used to love to read the Argus Observer sports section but it has become painful to see how bad it is now. "

TERMS OF USE

Those who post comments are accountable for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they furnish. While we encourage writers to utilize this service on our Web site, we also strongly suggest they treat it as public forum where good taste counts. We reserve the right to decline for approval objectionable material from these blogs.

Writers that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments - such as racists language, threats or comments unrelated to the story - will not be approved for the blogs. Also, entries that are unsigned or "signatures" by someone other than the actual writer will not be approved.

While writers can still post anonymously, we strongly suggest that they do not do so.

Opinions, guidance and other information expressed in Argus Observer story blog comments and on the Argus Observer blogs represent the individuals' own views and not necessarily those of the Argus Observer. The Argus Observer furnishes this type of forum and does not endorse and is not accountable for statements or advice from anyone other than an designated Argus Observer spokesperson.