Weather Magnet

News
Print this story  |  Email this story  |  [+] Text Size [-]  

Cat control program pays off for Baker City police
A key question, though, is whether it will be successful in Ontario



ONTARIO — For the past two years, the Baker City Police Department has implemented a trap, neuter, release program similar to the one Ontario is trying to establish.

Baker City Police Chief Wyn Lohner, who mentioned the feral cat program to Ontario Police Chief Mike Kee, said he really started noticing Baker City’s large feral cat problem while still working patrol.

“When I worked the road on night shift, it looked like every car had eyes underneath it,” Lohner said.

He said he didn’t hear a lot of complaints when he was on patrol or climbing the ranks, but when he became chief he heard from several people who were very vocal in their dislike of the cat problem.

“They were wanting to do a city ordinance like dogs at large, but it’s rather difficult to make people accountable for cats, and for feral cats, there is nobody you can hold accountable,” Lohner said.

After some research on the Internet, Lohner came across a feral cat organization in Oregon that put him on the path to establishing a trap, neuter, release program in Baker City.

The first big hurdle, however, was finding funding and people to take the program on, which is difficult for any city government to do on its own.

Baker City was fortunate enough to find somebody with an organization willing to take the lead on the program. Now, when the police department receives a complaint about animals, the community service/animal control officer tells the person about the trap, neuter and release program and about setting up a feeding schedule and feeding place for the cats so the animals can be trapped and taken to a local vet.

“I think the program has been a success in that it’s a proactive approach to trying to address the problem,” Lohner said.

Lohner warns the program takes ongoing commitment and funding for it to work.

“This isn’t a one-shot deal that’s going to fix (the problem),” he said.

While the city put in funds for the program, the woman who has taken the lead on the program has had to constantly search for funding through grants and other means.

“Continuing with the program is huge because you’re never going to get them all,” Lohner said of all feral cats. “So you have to stay after this or you’ve lost all the money that you’ve put in.”

Baker City Community Service Officer Shannon Regan, who handles the city’s animal complaints as well, said she has “absolutely” found the trap, neuter, release program to be beneficial.

“It’s been a tremendous program for us,” she said, adding it’s probably the second highest service the community service arm of the police department addresses.

Regan said the number of complaints she deals with has decreased significantly since the program was implemented, and the calls about litters of kittens, screeching mating calls and fighting have decreased. It has also made her job easier, she said.

“Instead of saying, ‘I’m sorry, there’s nothing I can do for you,’ I have a resource. I have a solution,” Regan said, adding, in addition to the TNR program, she can advise property owners on natural repellents that detract cats and other sources of information.

“It’s definitely made my job easier,” she said.

Another benefit of the program is, in addition to clipping the ears of the feral cats who have benefited from TNR, the animals are also vaccinated for rabies.

Ontario developer Riley Hill, however, is not convinced a neutering program would be effective and has had plenty of problems with feral cats around his apartments in town. He said many of the apartments have sandboxes near them for children to play in, but the cats in the neighborhood come and use them for litterboxes.

“Neutering them doesn’t do me any good,” he said. “They need to be disposed of, and to me, that’s my take on it.”

It’s a constant problem for Hill, and he doesn’t know of any repellents, natural or otherwise, that ward off cats, and he said he’s cautious about applying chemicals or other substances where children are eating and playing.

“I just wish we were allowed to catch them and dispose of them or the city would do it or sanction it or whatever,” Hill said.

Jessica Keller is the News Editor of the Daily Argus Observer. She can be contacted at JessicaK@argusobserver.com




Comment Blog - Note: All Comments Subject To Approval

concerned 2 wrote on Oct 7, 2009 10:45 AM:

" Have they found Billy G yet?? Hope not, he speaks the truth!! "

Barb Hutchinson wrote on Oct 2, 2009 4:11 PM:

" In response to "Concerned": I'm going to stick up for the veterinarians here. Saying that they should lower their prices so more people would get their cats spayed and neutered is kind of like saying that the grocery stores should lower their prices so more people can buy food. They have bills to pay and an office to run too, so thinking that their spay/neuter costs are the reason people don't get their cats fixed is really not fair. If people care about the problem of too many stray cats, then everyone needs to chip in a little bit and do their part and not expect the vets to solve it for the community.

Just for the record, 2nd Chance Animal Shelter in Fruitland has a cat spay/neuter program that they have been running for over five years. They get female cats spayed for $49 and male cats fixed for $39. All you have to do is call them at 452-PETS to get an appointment. So if you think the vets are too expensive, why not give 2nd Chance a try and get your cats fixed. It will prevent a lot of problems down the road. 2nd Chance has fixed over 3,000 community cats in the last 5 years. "

WHATEVER wrote on Sep 29, 2009 2:00 PM:

" OH NO, THEY HAVE BILLY G. NAME!! RUN BILLY RUN!! "

crazy horse wrote on Sep 29, 2009 11:15 AM:

" The only reason the cats are a problem is because the natural balance has been skewed. If we had a few more wolves in town.... "

ANIMAL PROTECTOR wrote on Sep 28, 2009 9:23 PM:

" To Billy G- Thank you for your name , I am sure the authorities will be very interested in your illegal activities.
First -degree animal abuse is intentionally, knowingly,or recklessly causing serious physical injury to an animal or cruelly killing an animal. It is typically a class A misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment of up to one year, a fine of up to $6,250, or both (Or.Rev.Stat-167.320(3). But it is a class C felony, punishable by imprisonment of up to five years, a fine of up to $125,000,or both, if the abuse occurs in the presence of a minor. It is also a class C felony if the offender has previously been convicted of at least two of the following offenses: (1) fourth-degree assault, (2) third-degree assault, (3) second-degree assault, (4) first-degree assault, (5) strangulation, (6) first-degree animal abuse, or (7) aggravated first degree animal abuse (Or.Rev.Stat-167.320(4). Aggravated first-degree animal abuse, which is also a class C felony, is defined as maliciously killing or intentionally or knowingly torturing an animal(Or.Rev.Stat-167.322).
Serial killers start out by killing and/or torturing small animals -when that doesn't thrill them anymore they go after bigger game-humans.
I am sure the Human Society will also be very interested in your "activities". "

Billy G. wrote on Sep 26, 2009 9:59 PM:

" I like cats. In my sights, how do you think I was taught to hit a moving target. Trap them and take them to hunter safety courses all over the state. "

cat lover wrote on Sep 26, 2009 4:00 PM:

" Yes it should be a "one shot" deal. One shot, one dead cat.
Can't we find better ways to waste money. "

ANIMAL PROTECTOR wrote on Sep 25, 2009 8:49 PM:

" To IDEA- that is a very irresponsible idea. Killing cats by throwing them in the Snake River ? Oh isn't that how serial killers start by killing small animals?
Read what Larry wrote on September 21- He and his wife have taken in strays -someone's cuddly pet at one time- him and his wife have nursed sick cats back to health and even rescued one poor cat that someone tossed from the Snake River Bridge and they still have her after 16 years. People like Larry take on the responsiblity of irresponsible people who don't take proper care of their pets.
To Ontario developer Riley Hill- if you have such a problem with feral cats why don't you be a part of the solution not part of the problem. Since you have sandboxes at your complexes have you thought about putting a fence around it-so that cats or other things will be not be in the sandbox -just children playing in clean sand. I have seen some of your complexes- one is near the fairgrounds where alot of cats are dumped by irresponsible people -they think it's up to the people in the neighborhood to take care of their unwanted pets. And since there is no leash law on cats they pretty much go where ever they want.
You say "Neutereing them doesn't do me any good " , "They need to be disposed of...
Neutereing prevents unwanted kittens from being born so there won't be the problem of so many feral cats.
You say you want them disposed of- that sounds like you just want to kill them.
If you know anything about the Ontario Oregon Municipal Code-Title 6 Police Regulations-Chapter 2- Animals,Dog, and Fowl-Section 21-Cruelty to Animals states-NO PERSON SHALL BEAT, MISUSE, TORTURE,KILL, DEPRIVE OF FOOD OR WATER OR OTHERWISE TREAT AN ANIMAL IN A CRUEL MANNER.
Instead of "disposing" try be a part of the solution- get involved with The Feral Cat Challenge- The City has already committed a $5,000 match- make a donation. I think we all have seen your beautuful mansion.
You can make a tax-deductable contribution at Ontario City Hall- our Police Chief Mike Kee is with this project, also several veterinarians-Eastern Oregon Animal Health, Ontario Animal Hospital and Four Rivers Veterinary clinic. If you would like to volunteer or want more information contact them. You can also read a very good article in Pet Friendly Magazine.com about "TNR" Trap-Neuter-Release.
And I think if we all pull together as a community this will work and maybe we can outdo what Baker city has done. "

Barb Hutchinson wrote on Sep 25, 2009 7:51 PM:

" Something not mentioned in this article is one of the reasons this program is successful is that when the cats are spayed and neutered and returned to the area they were in, they defend their colony and tend to keep other cats from coming in to that colony. The colony then becomes smaller by attrition and the problems associated with more and more cats is eliminated. If you kill off all the cats two unfortunate things happen: One, you will become overrun with rodents, including rats and voles, and, two, you wil create a void and other cats will keep coming into the area and in a year or so you will end up where you were before you killed them all to start with. The police killed off the stray cats in downtown Payette in the late 1970's and when the Bancroft hotel burned down in 1979, you could stand there and watch the rats, and I mean BIG rats come running out to escape the flames. And a couple of years later, they had the cat problem back because new strays came in and set up housekeeping with their wonderful new food supply, the rodents. So Trap, Neuter, Return has proved to be the only thing that really has a positive effect in the long run. "

concerned wrote on Sep 25, 2009 4:27 PM:

" "Idea" Is that a trap and off to the river with Mr. Hill? It's not the animals fault, it the owner's and it is very costly to have your cat or kitten "fixed". Maybe if a vet would lower their price on this more people would do it. It's also hard when people drop off their cats to neighboring farms and then responsible people have to take them in and get them fixed. I had 3 different cats that were dropped and of course I became attatched to them so in they went. I am all for the program that Baker has set up. "

IDEA... wrote on Sep 25, 2009 12:09 PM:

" Instead of the program being trap, neuter and release; make it trap & off to the snake river. I think that would solve Mr. Hill's problem! "


TERMS OF USE

Those who post comments are accountable for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they furnish. While we encourage writers to utilize this service on our Web site, we also strongly suggest they treat it as public forum where good taste counts. We reserve the right to decline for approval objectionable material from these blogs.

Writers that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments - such as racists language, threats or comments unrelated to the story - will not be approved for the blogs. Also, entries that are unsigned or "signatures" by someone other than the actual writer will not be approved.

While writers can still post anonymously, we strongly suggest that they do not do so.

Opinions, guidance and other information expressed in Argus Observer story blog comments and on the Argus Observer blogs represent the individuals' own views and not necessarily those of the Argus Observer. The Argus Observer furnishes this type of forum and does not endorse and is not accountable for statements or advice from anyone other than an designated Argus Observer spokesperson.


(optional)
   

All Newspaper Ads
Place a classified ad

Community Calendar
February 2010
S M Tu W Th F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28

» This Week's Events
» Submit an Event
Click to View All Events

Business Directory
Find a business near you
Business Type

OR Business Name

Web Search
Google
 

Find out about our RSS feeds and what they are.

Copyright © 2010 Argus Observer - www.argusobserver.com. All rights reserved. | Unathorized reproduction is prohibited.