Weather Magnet

News
Print this story  |  Email this story  |  [+] Text Size [-]  

Fruitland board approves new park rules



FRUITLAND — Planning on using one of Fruitland many parks? Better watch your P’s and Q’s.

The Fruitland City Council Monday passed a new ordinance defining conduct in public parks, including what type of behavior is acceptable.

It is not the first time the draft ordinance has come before the City Council.

In June, a similar ordinance, originated by council member Keith Schuller, came before the City Council, but was returned to City Administrator Rick Watkins because council members didn’t feel the language was specific enough for the intentions of the ordinance.

This time through, Schuller again took exception to the proposed ordinance.

“I’m going to vote against because it is not restrictive enough on bicycles,” Schuller said. “It’s better, but it’s not what I want.”

“Yeah, and I want to be 6 foot tall … but that ain’t going to happen, either,” quipped council member Ed Pierson.

In the end, three members of the council — Pierson, Vicky Cox and Ken Bishop — all felt the draft was sufficient and voted to pass the ordinance on its first reading. Schuller cast the lone dissenting vote.

Ordinance No. 507 specifically spells out what city parks and parks belonging to Payette County Recreation District within the city can be used for. Also, the ordinance defines who can use the parks at what times of day and what type of conduct can be used in the parks and penalties should those rules be disobeyed.

Schuller said his biggest problem with the ordinance was that it was not restrictive enough concerning the use of bicycles and skateboards in parks situated in the downtown portion of Fruitland. Schuller said he has witnessed too many instances where bicyclists and skate boarders have come too close to other people using the park’s sidewalks.

In another issue involving parks within the city, the Fruitland City Council ordered Public Works Supervisor Jerry Campbell to begin work on removing several cottonwood trees from a park situated in the Crestview Subdivision in the city’s southwest end.

A citizen’s request brought in front of the council at its July 13 meeting alerted council members to a problem concerning the trees. Alan Finch approached the council saying once the cottonwoods bloom, they spread their cotton throughout the subdivision, making it look like it is snowing from June through August.

“The litter from these trees chokes plants and grass and makes air conditioning units nonefficient,” Finch told the council. “I would like to see the city bring those trees down and put something in their place.”

Several of Finch’s neighbors from the subdivision were also present at the meeting but did not have to testify.

Campbell told council members he had looked into the problem and was prepared to hire a firm to remove those cottonwood trees, while replacing the missing trees with new trees that are already 12 feet to 15 feet tall.

Campbell said the city would do as much of the work as it could in the park, but the part of cutting the trees down and removing the brush from the trees would be best left to a firm that deals with tree removal.

He said the firm he contacted would cut the trees into 8 foot lengths, which would be manageable for city crews to handle. As well, he said, the firm would either remove or grind up the large brush from the trees.

Councilman Bishop asked if there would be any value to the leftover wood, but Campbell said it could be more of a problem trying to sell the wood, rather than just disposing of it.

Campbell suggested he have the firm grind the stumps to below ground level, where crews could then poison the remaining portion of the stumps and cover it with soil.

Total cost to the city for the removal of the trees and the planting of new trees will be approximately $2,130, which Campbell suggested the city use out of State Revenue Sharing.

In other action, the council agreed to a new contract for a school resource officer, pending the approval of the Fruitland School Board. The City Council and the School Board will meet in a combined meeting at 6 p.m. Aug. 10 in the Fruitland School District’s Administration Building. The council also accepted a JAG grant for approximately $20,000, which will go to aid in the purchase of a new police cruiser for the city. Finally, the council tentatively approved the approximately $12.6 million budget for the 2009-2010 fiscal year.




Comment Blog - Note: All Comments Subject To Approval

Mother of 4 wrote on Aug 12, 2009 2:34 PM:

" The good news is that people FROM Fruitland are still running Fruitland. I believe they do get high-centered on certain items--like kids riding bikes in the park--but, overall,their goal seems to be retaining the smalltown flavor, while putting on a little polish. Water availability is an issue everywhere. So are pitbulls. This city council, I feel, has done its best to be well-informed and decisive, and to prioritize with the needs of the citizens in mind. This said, I have to put my two cents worth in and ask that something be done about N. Pennsylvania. All those houses have been built out there, yet we have the same skinny little country road that was there 20 years ago, when it was all alfalfa and lettuce seed. "

You think Fruitland has problems wrote on Aug 12, 2009 8:32 AM:

" So tell me, what is the best Good ol boy method or the way Payette currently has it. It seems that the Good ol boy does pretty darn good. I wish Payette had the Good ol Boy rather than Henderson being a puppet for the police and fire chief. And if you know so much on how to run things, why dont you get off you butt and do something about it. Oh I see, it is not that easy now is it. "

CMN wrote on Aug 11, 2009 3:11 PM:

" There are so many issues with the direction Fruitland has taken lately that it's hard to figure out which battle to fight! Anybody that lives here knows what a bunch of "Good 'Ol Boys" the City Council is, and that the residents stand a snowball's chance in Haiti of getting them to make some responsible decisions.

If the City doesn't want the kids playing in the park, why don't they provide some kind of a center for the kids? Every weekend the downtown park is full of cars from Oregon. Here's an idea. Instead of letting all the out-of-state folks use the park on our dime, why not charge them for their weddings and birthday parties and dog training classes and whatever else goes on there. Then use that money to build something for the kids?

If there are too many kids looking for something to do, why doesn't the Council stop approving building permits???? If you quit putting up houses, there won't be anyplace for people to move in to. Less houses equals less people...duh! We don't have the services to take care of the people that are already here. Common sense would say, stop building! Fruitland City Council (lack of) sense says, what the heck, build a couple hundred more homes and we'll use all those extra tax dollars to give City employees raises, and buy a couple new cruisers and what the heck, let City employees take the cars home with them. The taxpayers have no problem paying for the fuel. Oh, the water has problems? Oh dear... well, let's use the money from a bond election to pay for that, oh, and why not raise the base rate for water while we're at it? The residents enjoy being screwed over.....

The City Council is completely out of touch with the regular, not related to the good 'ol boys, people in this town. If any of you can figure out how to get rid of all of them and start over, let me know! "

Down the Street wrote on Aug 10, 2009 2:58 PM:

" Members of the council in Fruitland want to control the level of children's play in the city park, yet nobody says anything about the loud, rowdy behavior of bar patrons carrousing on the sidewalk. For most of my long life, I've lived in a residential neighborhood a block from Fruitland's downtown. Friday and Saturday nights are becoming unbearable. "

TO WPD wrote on Aug 6, 2009 8:38 AM:

" What are crudindals???? Sounds like yours are the only ones that need checked. "

WPD resonse wrote on Aug 5, 2009 3:36 PM:

" it would be best to check his crudindals and where they came from before pating this one one the back keep the jury out on this one. "

To bike rider mom wrote on Aug 5, 2009 12:35 PM:

" You are right about Penn. Ave being very dangerous to ride bikes. I have complained for over 20 years about it to the city!!!They always say they have more pressing matters that need attention. I guess it will take someone getting hurt badly to get there attention!!! "

Concerned wrote on Aug 5, 2009 12:05 PM:

" From things I've been hearing around town, it's time we vote in new city council members and brake up the obvious buddy system we have going on. I vote for Amazed! "

Bike-rider Mom wrote on Aug 4, 2009 5:51 PM:

" So, what did the Council finally decide about bikes in the city parks? I didn't see a summary of this in the article. Those sidewalks at the park are a great place for beginning riders to practice. The sidewalks at the high school are good, too, in the evenings when there are no school activities. I'm kind of at a loss, though, about where I should allow my 10-15 year-olds to ride. Local residents have not proven to be very patient about bikes on the street, but there aren't bike paths, or even consecutive sidewalks in our part of town. The street I'd really like to see get some attention with bikeriders in mind is N. Pennsylvania. I used to let my kids ride their bikes to Mesa Park for baseball, until I rode it with them once. That route is just not safe! "

to huffy wrote on Aug 3, 2009 2:56 PM:

" i will agree wgy must they morminize and control everyone and every thing. "

FINALLY a NEW SRO wrote on Jul 30, 2009 7:03 PM:

" I visited briefly with one of the Fruitland Officers at Stinker the other day. He told me that they have appointed a new SRO from within the department!!! HOORRRAAAYY! And one of their best at that! Our kids deserve the best FPD, THANKS for finally making this program a priority!!! "

Amazed wrote on Jul 30, 2009 6:59 PM:

" Sadly, I'm not at all surprised that the Fruitland City Council is treating the PUBLIC PARKS as if they were their own back yards.

So, you can only play here if you do what we want you to do? And the only "no" vote was because it wasn't restrictive enough?!?!? Kids shouldn't ride their bikes or skateboards in a park? Why not make them talk with their "inside voices" and not run too? Absolutely ridiculous. So Fruitland City Council, where are your police statistics that support that there have been "incidents" at the parks that would justify these restrictions? Ah nevermind, your boy Huff at the PD would just make up the stats to fulfil both of your agendas. Do as you wish your majesties. "

Fruitland Parent wrote on Jul 30, 2009 5:29 PM:

" Baladez is a complete embarrassment as far as an officer of the law goes. To call him a "law enforcement officer" is really stretching the definition as far as Im concerned. He needs to be replaced, and SOON! I cant believe that tax dollars are wasted on him. "

I heard wrote on Jul 30, 2009 10:10 AM:

" I heard the other day, Baladez was not going to be the resourse officer this year..... "

what the heck wrote on Jul 29, 2009 7:37 PM:

" What the heck are you talking about huffy?

As far as I am concerned the resourse officer is way over paid for what he "Does not do" "

Questioning wrote on Jul 29, 2009 7:12 PM:

" Next they will tell you what you can wear to the park. Khaki's and collared shirts for sure.... "

huffy wrote on Jul 29, 2009 10:49 AM:

" that would be just like you pick on the little kids and the boy scouts take a bite out of crime. "


TERMS OF USE

Those who post comments are accountable for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they furnish. While we encourage writers to utilize this service on our Web site, we also strongly suggest they treat it as public forum where good taste counts. We reserve the right to decline for approval objectionable material from these blogs.

Writers that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments - such as racists language, threats or comments unrelated to the story - will not be approved for the blogs. Also, entries that are unsigned or "signatures" by someone other than the actual writer will not be approved.

While writers can still post anonymously, we strongly suggest that they do not do so.

Opinions, guidance and other information expressed in Argus Observer story blog comments and on the Argus Observer blogs represent the individuals' own views and not necessarily those of the Argus Observer. The Argus Observer furnishes this type of forum and does not endorse and is not accountable for statements or advice from anyone other than an designated Argus Observer spokesperson.


(optional)
   

All Newspaper Ads
Place a classified ad

Community Calendar
February 2010
S M Tu W Th F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28

» This Week's Events
» Submit an Event
Click to View All Events

Business Directory
Find a business near you
Business Type

OR Business Name

Web Search
Google
 

Find out about our RSS feeds and what they are.

Copyright © 2010 Argus Observer - www.argusobserver.com. All rights reserved. | Unathorized reproduction is prohibited.