Weather Magnet

News
Print this story  |  Email this story  |  [+] Text Size [-]  

Senators say border crime fight needs more money



WASHINGTON — The head of the Homeland Security Department told the Senate on Wednesday that the Obama administration’s beefed-up efforts to fight violence on the Southwest border is not the last word.

Several senators questioned whether the administration’s plan can be successful without more money and people. The administration announced Tuesday that it was sending hundreds of federal agents, along with high-tech surveillance gear and drug-sniffing dogs to the Southwest border.

It was largely relying on existing funds and resources at the departments of Homeland Security and Justice for the increased effort. It also includes $700 million that Congress has already approved to support Mexico’s efforts to fight the drug cartels.

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said that the border violence plan is not the last word on the issue. Napolitano testified before the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee.

The border security initiative, which expands on efforts begun during the Bush administration, is aimed at drug traffickers who have wreaked havoc in Mexico in recent years and are blamed for a spate of kidnappings and home invasions in some U.S. cities.

‘‘I think you’re going to need more resources to get the job done,’’ Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., told Napolitano. Lieberman said he plans to ask the Senate Budget Committee to include an additional $380 million toward this Southwest border plan in the 2010 federal budget.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., echoed Lieberman’s push for more money.

‘‘I can’t think of a better use of our time and public dollars,’’ Graham said.

Among the moves the government is making:

—Sending about 350 additional personnel from the Homeland Security Department for a host of border-related work, including doubling the border enforcement security teams that combine local, state and federal officers.




Comment Blog - Note: All Comments Subject To Approval


TERMS OF USE

Those who post comments are accountable for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they furnish. While we encourage writers to utilize this service on our Web site, we also strongly suggest they treat it as public forum where good taste counts. We reserve the right to decline for approval objectionable material from these blogs.

Writers that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments - such as racists language, threats or comments unrelated to the story - will not be approved for the blogs. Also, entries that are unsigned or "signatures" by someone other than the actual writer will not be approved.

While writers can still post anonymously, we strongly suggest that they do not do so.

Opinions, guidance and other information expressed in Argus Observer story blog comments and on the Argus Observer blogs represent the individuals' own views and not necessarily those of the Argus Observer. The Argus Observer furnishes this type of forum and does not endorse and is not accountable for statements or advice from anyone other than an designated Argus Observer spokesperson.


(optional)
   

All Newspaper Ads
Place a classified ad

Community Calendar
March 2010
S M Tu W Th F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31

» This Week's Events
» Submit an Event
Click to View All Events

Business Directory
Find a business near you
Business Type

OR Business Name

Web Search
Google
 

Find out about our RSS feeds and what they are.

Copyright © 2010 Argus Observer - www.argusobserver.com. All rights reserved. | Unathorized reproduction is prohibited.