Weather Magnet

News
Print this story  |  Email this story  |  [+] Text Size [-]  

Library future shrouded in mystery
Officials decline to comment on subject



Librarian Dorreen Jones sorts books at the City of Ontario-owned library building in this file photo. Ontario Mayor Joe Dominick, Ontario Public Library District Board Chair Donnaclaire Blankinship and lawyers from both sides met earlier this week to discuss the building’s future.
Ontario — When it comes to the ongoing Ontario Library and City of Ontario saga, “mums” the word.

That’s because neither city officials or members of the newly-formed library district board representatives are saying much about the subject.

At issue is whether the newly-formed library district should have to pay rent to the city for use of the existing library building.

City officials appear committed to working out some kind of payment plan, while library district leaders have submitted requests to the city detailing a belief the building should be gifted to them. Some city officials called the building an asset and said it should be treated as such, but district leaders assert a large amount of rent will damage their budget and prevent them from providing services such as increased hours promised prior to the November election.

Ontario Mayor Joe Dominick said he met Monday at the Ontario City Hall with Ontario Public Library District Board Chair Donnaclaire Blankinship, as well as Ontario City Attorney Larry Sullivan and Bob Butler, attorney for the newly-formed library district.

“I called and invited them down,” Dominick said of the meeting in a phone interview Tuesday. “It was very cordial.”

However, Dominick declined to comment on whether the city or the library district made an offer regarding the building at that meeting.

The building is currently owned by the city and was built through a $220,000 city bond in 1966. The state library board gave the city library a grant for $180,000 with the stipulation the library building would always be used as a library.

At a special meeting Jan. 22, the City Council discussed the creation of what Dominick called an initial offer, an agreement with the library district to pay $5,000 a month to the city in rent costs. Ontario City Council member Norm Crume said this money would go into a separate fund to pay for roof and heating and cooling replacement with the next year’s rent going into the general fund if the first year’s rent money was not used.

At its Feb. 4 meeting, the library district board rejected this offer and instead presented a counter-offer to the city requesting the building be gifted to the newly-formed district based on Oregon State Librarian Jim Scheppke’s recommendations. Library District Board Budget Committee Chairman Paul Erlebach presented a letter from Scheppke with his recommendation to the City Council at its work session Feb. 12.

In Scheppke’s letter, the state librarian said he believed leasing the library would be inconsistent with the assurance the City of Ontario made in 1966 that the building would always be used as a library.

Later, in an Argus Observer story, Scheppke said he was prompted to write the letter because of what he felt was a lack of awareness regarding the 1966 agreement the city made with the state library to secure funds to build the library.

Earlier this month, the city held a public meeting at Four Rivers Cultural Center and allowed those in attendance to voice their opinions on the future of the city-owned building. A majority of more than 150 people in attendance raised their hands indicating they felt the city should gift the building to the library board. However, the vote was not unanimous, with some people voicing their opinions asserting the city should not gift the building.

City officials said the meeting would serve as an opportunity to learn more about what the public thinks. The council then went into executive session recently to discuss the issue.

Where these negotiations stand now is anyone’s guess.

“I’m not in a position to discuss that and I won’t be until we’re farther along in these discussions,” Library District Attorney Bob Butler said in a phone interview Wednesday afternoon.

Butler said Ontario City Attorney Larry Sullivan e-mailed him for a timeline on when the library board would be further along in discussions as well. However, Butler would not offer any further details.

“They’re taking a proposal back to their board,” Sullivan said in a phone interview Wednesday afternoon.

Sullivan would not comment on whether or not that proposal came from the city.

“I’m not in a position to talk about that,” he said, citing the fact the issue is still under negotiation.

Butler was similarly tight-lipped.

“That’s as much as I’m going to tell you because it’s all up in the air,” he said. Sullivan also could not give a timeframe on when the library issue would be discussed since he said he did not know when the newly-formed board would be meeting next. The library board normally meets on the first Thursday of the month at 5 p.m., however, the board does have the ability to call special meetings.

 




Comment Blog - Note: All Comments Subject To Approval

other side wrote on Apr 1, 2009 10:02 PM:

" I have noticed that none of you have even questioned the Library District board. What is their position, other than Free? They must be gods! They can do no wrong? Just because one group says "pay" and the District says "Free free free or NOTHING" makes them right. If they are so right, what happens when the District Library Board say NO to the final offer, and the city closes the library? Who is wrong then? Well of course the City council and mayor. The Library District board are GODS! They can do no wrong. Free Free FREE! The Obama way! Give it all away, nobody has to pay for it. FREE, the new American symbol, ObamamaniaFree! Sweet, we have Library District Gods! and Ontario citizens willing to pay tithing in the amount of $540,000 per year to them! Remember, do not question GODS! They are always right, even when "it does not come to pass", they are still GODS and right! Support the Library District Board Gods, let the library close! "

Older than dirt wrote on Mar 29, 2009 3:14 PM:

" The problem is not Dominick as much as it is David Sullivan. He gives new meaning to the word sleeze...His total lack of professionalism and his disrespect for all parties when he served on the TVCC Board should have been evidence enough to keep him off the counci. Personally, I will not do business in any establishment owned or operated by any council member who votes to charge the library district rent. And, I will encourage everyone I know, and even stanger in line at the grocery store to boycott those businesses also. Perhaps you all should consider doing the same. "

black dove wrote on Mar 27, 2009 5:03 PM:

" Impeach, impeach, Impeach! "

Salty Dog wrote on Mar 26, 2009 2:56 PM:

" The only mystery here is how did a simpleton like PJ get to be Mayor? The rest is par for the course. "

Whispers wrote on Mar 25, 2009 10:49 PM:

" Could someone enlighten me about the public meeting law in Oregon. I think Joe, Norm, Susan and David should study it. I wonder if when they meet at the cafe if that might be a violation of the public meeting law. Did anyone see a notice of a meeting published. "

Chester wrote on Mar 24, 2009 7:33 AM:

" To Trusted Reader, that was just double talk from Joe and Norm and they are experts of the trade. They are controlled by people who work behind the scenes and this is just another example of how they operate (behind closed doors) "

Trusted Reader wrote on Mar 22, 2009 8:29 PM:

" Look at the results of the public meeting. I thought there was going to be openness and integrity in this new council. I don't see any of this. I bet what you will hear from this council is the stories from people that don't show up to the meetings or will give their name. The library should move causing the city to have a worthless building or pay back the $180,000 at today's dollar. "

Crusty wrote on Mar 22, 2009 2:53 PM:

" Pinocchio Joe and his minuet Norm Crumb, caught in a big lie again. Shame on them for fooling us once, shame on us for letting them do it again and again. "

Homer wrote on Mar 22, 2009 2:50 PM:

" As long as the amatuers are running the city nothing good is going to happen in Ontario. Will the real leaders please get off the sidelines and take your place on the Boards and Councils of this pitiful city. "

Larry wrote on Mar 20, 2009 6:04 PM:

" Told ya he would make us pay before "they" pay. It's the "we maintain the shopping mall" affect. I hope you're happy Joe. Exactly WHO is pulling your puppet strings? The developers or the "business interests" Those who contributed to your campaign? It never was about representing the community was it? Be open with us and remind everybody who your "silent" partner was on the SDC lawsuit, and the committee he chairs now.

Now we know the SDC suit was not filed on behalf of the citizens of Ontario but only a select few....who had lost their powers before you you were elected.

Your ignorance on this library thing doesn't surprise me. Are there only three of you interested in this stupid idea of yours? "

Phil Ayers wrote on Mar 20, 2009 9:30 AM:

" The city has told the taxpayers many
times they did not have the funds keep the Library open. So, we the taxpayers
voted to create a revenue stream for the Library to continue operation. Now,
not only does the Mayor have the extra
money from no longer funding the Library, he wants to dip into the money
we has voters dedicated to the Library.
Sounds like double dipping to me. "

buk Warm wrote on Mar 20, 2009 8:27 AM:

" Just route the money over to that mini-thug center down the street. That's where Ontario's future is really going. "

Taxpayer II wrote on Mar 19, 2009 3:58 PM:

" If the message was loud and clear why doesn't the city council transfer the deed over to the library district? Joe wasn't even at the meeting. Why have they told the library board to come up with a new idea. They must not like what the taxpayers have already told them. You can buy a new fire truck, you can fix a pothole on the underpass for $35,000, you can lend businesses money that never gets paid back, why can't you do what the taxpayers are asking you to do and turn over control of the library to the newly elected district whose job it is to run the library? Maybe illiteracy doesn't matter to you. Maybe you can't give up control. The newly elected board was chosen to run the library, not you. Norm, you said you would listen to what the people had to say. The people have spoken. DEED IT OVER! " "

Taxpayer wrote on Mar 19, 2009 3:53 PM:

" The city council wanted the opinion of the taxpayers of Ontario. Norm said he would listen to what they said. The meeting was held. Mayor Joe didn't show up. Norm said that he would do the will of the taxpayers but it has not happened. They still insist on asking the district for money when an overwhelming majority of the taxpayers said that they don't want to pay for the building again. If the 3 at the meeting want to pay again, please do. Give the city council all the money you want. The overwhelming majority have spoken. The city council needs to deed over the library building to the newly formed library district board who were elected to run the library. City council-give up the control. You were not elected to run the library. "


TERMS OF USE

Those who post comments are accountable for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they furnish. While we encourage writers to utilize this service on our Web site, we also strongly suggest they treat it as public forum where good taste counts. We reserve the right to decline for approval objectionable material from these blogs.

Writers that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments - such as racists language, threats or comments unrelated to the story - will not be approved for the blogs. Also, entries that are unsigned or "signatures" by someone other than the actual writer will not be approved.

While writers can still post anonymously, we strongly suggest that they do not do so.

Opinions, guidance and other information expressed in Argus Observer story blog comments and on the Argus Observer blogs represent the individuals' own views and not necessarily those of the Argus Observer. The Argus Observer furnishes this type of forum and does not endorse and is not accountable for statements or advice from anyone other than an designated Argus Observer spokesperson.


(optional)
   

All Newspaper Ads
Place a classified ad

Community Calendar
November 2009
S M Tu W Th F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30

» This Week's Events
» Submit an Event
Click to View All Events

Business Directory
Find a business near you
Business Type

OR Business Name

Web Search
Google
 

Find out about our RSS feeds and what they are.

Copyright © 2009 Argus Observer - www.argusobserver.com. All rights reserved. | Unathorized reproduction is prohibited.