State librarian: No dog in city fight
By Katie Pizza
Argus Observer
Wednesday, March 4, 2009 11:17 AM PST
Ontario — The Oregon state librarian said Tuesday that, while he is interested in community outreach to make the history of Ontario’s book center known in Malheur County neither he, nor the state, is looking to get involved in the current skirmish between the newly-formed library district and the city.
Oregon State Librarian Jim Sheppke said the state library’s interest is not to “get in the middle” of current talks but to simply shed light on the situation.
Currently at issue, is how much, if anything, the city should charge in rent to the newly-formed library district for the library building.
Sheppke’s role in the saga revolving around the city and the voter-approved Ontario Library District emerged last month in connection to a letter. In the letter, mailed to Ontario Public Library District Chair Donnaclaire Blankinship, Sheppke wrote that he believed leasing the library would be inconsistent with the assurance the city of Ontario made in 1966 that the building would always be used as a library.
Sheppke said he was prompted to write the letter because of what he felt was a lack of awareness regarding the 1966 agreement the city made with the state library to secure funds to build the library building. At the time, $220,000 was budgeted by the city in a bond election to build the new library. The state library board distributed a $180,000 grant to the library with the stipulation the building would always be used as a library.
“The grant application indicates that this was 45 percent of the cost of the $400,000 project,” he said in the letter.
In a phone interview Tuesday afternoon, Sheppke repeated what he said in the letter, mainly that charging the library rent would be inconsistent with the arrangements between cities and counties and other library districts.
Sheppke said when the ownership of the library “changed hands,” most other cities and counties saw fit to give the building to the newly-formed district.
“I think they do that because they realize the library building doesn’t really belong to them,” he said.
Sheppke said he believes the library belongs to the community and that, when a city or county gives the building to the new district, the city or county allows itself to focus its attention on other city needs, benefiting both sides.
“The right thing to do is just give the building to the new unit of local government,” he said.
The fact that Ontario city government has not reached the same conclusion as many other cities regarding use of the library building seems “strange.”
In a phone interview Tuesday afternoon, Ontario City Council member David Sullivan said he believed charging the library district rent has nothing to do with not allowing the building to function as a library.
“I don’t know why the state librarian is even getting involved,” he said.
Ontario City Council member Charlotte Fugate, who knows Sheppke personally because of their involvement with the Oregon State Heritage Commission, said she was a little surprised about Sheppke getting involved in “local politics.”
“But I’m pretty sure it’s because the library board went to him,” she said.
In a phone interview Tuesday afternoon, Sheppke said he has been updated on issues regarding the newly-formed library district and has been consulted on issues since the library board was attempting to create its own district.
“We’ve been in frequent conversations,” he said.
Last week, Ontario City Council member Norm Crume said that just because other cities have opted to give their buildings away doesn’t mean Ontario should. Ontario Mayor Joe Dominick has also referred to the importance of the city protecting its asset.
Though city officials have continued to maintain that $5,000 a month in rent is a flexible figure, Sheppke expressed the same opinion brought forth by Ontario Public Library District Budget Committee Chairman Paul Erlebach last month, which is that money could be used to fund other library needs.
“If the library district has to use some of their limited budget to pay rent, they may not be able to buy as many books or have as many programs,” Sheppke said.
Ontario resident Joe Maldonado, 47, also cited books and programs as one reason he did not believe the city should charge an “unreasonable” amount of rent to the newly-formed district. He also found fault with the fact that the city will be placing some of the money into the general fund.
“It just seems like the city is just trying to get a hold of the money and use it for something else,” he said.
Library district voters can secure an opportunity to deliver feedback on the issue during a town hall session at 6:30 Thursday at Four Rivers Cultural Center.
Sheesh wrote on Mar 10, 2009 1:24 AM:
Ysy. "