Weather Magnet

Opinion
Print this story  |  Email this story  |  [+] Text Size [-]  

Library District woes



Give it away free, or rent your public property, that is the question.

You have all read now, with limited information, both sides of the library discussion. It truly comes down to one simple question: Do we give away, free, your publically-owned property that you have paid into for more than 40 years, or rent your publically-owned property that you have paid into for more than 40 years?

Approximately 4,000 Ontario city residents originally paid for the building, along with a grant, back in the 1960s. For the last three years, 4,000 Ontario city residents have continued to pay for the operation of the library, while many others have used it for little or no cost.

With the passage of the Library District, along with 4,000 city residents, people living in the 8C School District boundaries are funding the new Library District, which will now oversee the operations of the library. This is great, because now the library will have stable funding and will possibly increase hours of service.

Yes, it does remove the library from being funding through the city general fund. However, the citizens of Ontario still own, and have paid for, the building. Many of you have told City Councilors, we should not give away our paid for building. Others have told Councilors, “Give it to the district. We have already paid for it.”

As elected officials, we must always use taxpayers’ dollars as wisely as possible. This includes items purchased with those dollars, such as City Hall, fire trucks, police cars, pubic works vehicles, city-owned property and buildings. When an item purchased with your dollars is no longer needed, it is put on the surplus list and offered for sale. Examples include, used police cars, used equipment from public works and even land. These items are given a realistic value and are sold to the pubic or other government agencies.

Some members of the Council believe the library building should be treated the same way. The building is 22,600 square feet, including the basement. As the council discussed being responsible with taxpayer property, many ideas were brought up. Some Councilors would like to give your building away. The council ultimately decided to create a lease for the building because it is a city taxpayer asset.

Contrary to items written, or being said, this lease is not “set in stone.” Since you, the taxpayer, own the building, we started the process with an “offer.” The City is “offering” to lease the building to the Library District. With respect to the taxpayer, the council added a dollar amount, at about half of the current square-foot rate of commercial buildings. Remember, this is a council “first offer.”

The Council received the first official reply from the Library District Board on Monday. In part, it reads: “request the Ontario City Council ... to gift the present library building to the people of the Ontario Library District.”

As mayor, along with your Councilors, we believe this is an important issue for you, the taxpayer. We have set up a community meeting to hear from you at 6 p.m. March 5 at Four Rivers Cultural Center. We want to hear your thoughts and ideas, so we know the direction Ontario taxpayers want us to take.

Please join us at the meeting. Even if all you say is a few words, such as “rent it” or “gift it,” it will tell your elected officials your thoughts and make the democratic process work the way it is intended.

Remember, your hard-earned dollars paid for the building. Do we give your building away, or do we rent it?

Thank you for your attendance, Mayor Joe.

Joe Dominick is the Ontario City Mayor.




Comment Blog - Note: All Comments Subject To Approval

Fred wrote on Mar 1, 2009 9:38 PM:

" Hers is an idea, if you truly want a fair market rate try putting the rent of the Library out to bid and let the highest qualified bid rent the building,. This would be much better than you and your drinking Pal David setting an arbitrary rent amount. "

Get Back Joe Joe wrote on Mar 1, 2009 9:28 PM:

" Get back joe joe, you are robbing peter to pay paul. If the city intended on demanding rent from the library why didn’t you make that clear to the public before the election, now we can call you back door joe. Don’t you think the $100,000 plus the city now saves because of what some hard working volunteers did to pass the Library District is enough? You did more to hinder this than help and your continued interference is not appreciated. "

Larry wrote on Feb 26, 2009 6:22 PM:

" Pat
Your placement of this topic as compared to the opinion of Mr. Banner's, shows me your bias? Is the opinion of Joe's and the ranting of Mr. Hicks more important than a citizen opinion.

If it's about Sloppy's opinion about giving the library away, then maybe it's time to discuss the other city services "given away" all because you and this idiot believe an alternative means was "not good for Ontario"

Please put opposing views side by side not in an itsy bitsy corner where you and that Joeboy hope nobody notices. "

What wrote on Feb 26, 2009 4:57 PM:

" Let me see if I get this straight. You want the Ontario taxpayers who already paid for the library building to keep paying for it by paying rent? And the people who don't live in Ontario (or Oregon for that matter) get to use our streets and services for nothing? Something isn't right here. We get to pay twice for the same thing and some people pay nothing at all. "


TERMS OF USE

Those who post comments are accountable for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they furnish. While we encourage writers to utilize this service on our Web site, we also strongly suggest they treat it as public forum where good taste counts. We reserve the right to decline for approval objectionable material from these blogs.

Writers that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments - such as racists language, threats or comments unrelated to the story - will not be approved for the blogs. Also, entries that are unsigned or "signatures" by someone other than the actual writer will not be approved.

While writers can still post anonymously, we strongly suggest that they do not do so.

Opinions, guidance and other information expressed in Argus Observer story blog comments and on the Argus Observer blogs represent the individuals' own views and not necessarily those of the Argus Observer. The Argus Observer furnishes this type of forum and does not endorse and is not accountable for statements or advice from anyone other than an designated Argus Observer spokesperson.


(optional)
   

All Newspaper Ads
Place a classified ad

Community Calendar
February 2010
S M Tu W Th F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28

» This Week's Events
» Submit an Event
Click to View All Events

Business Directory
Find a business near you
Business Type

OR Business Name

Web Search
Google
 

Find out about our RSS feeds and what they are.

Copyright © 2010 Argus Observer - www.argusobserver.com. All rights reserved. | Unathorized reproduction is prohibited.