Library board wants building for free
By Katie Pizza
Argus Observer
Friday, February 20, 2009 10:50 AM PST
Ontario — The Ontario Public Library District endorsed a letter to the Ontario City Council at its meeting Wednesday night regarding the future of the city-owned library building.
At a special meeting Jan. 22, the council decided to create a contract to charge the library $5,000 a month for use of the building and agreed to pay half of the cost for replacing the elevator in the facility and the heating and cooling systems should the need arise. This rental agreement would last 10 years if approved by the library board and is slated to be reviewed every eight years.
City officials have repeatedly said this proposal is an initial offer and is by no means set in stone.
The response letter, composed by Ontario City Public Library District Donnaclaire Blankinship, requested the City of Ontario gift the library building to the newly-formed district. It was signed by Blankinship, Ontario Public Library District Board member Amy Couture and Ontario Public Library District Board member Sharon Jones.
“As we all realize, the building at the center of this discussion cannot be used for anything other than a library, which relieves the city of any other use, or commercial value,” Blankinship said as she read her letter into the record. In the letter, Blankinship also referred to another letter, this one written by Oregon State Librarian Jim Scheppke, who recommended the city gift the building to the Ontario City Public Library District. Ontario Public Library District Board Budget Committee Chairman Paul Erlebach presented the letter to the City Council at its work session Feb. 12. The state librarian letter also stated the City of Ontario assured the state library the library building would not function as anything else but a library in exchange for a $180,000 grant using Federal Library Services and Construction Act funds in December 1966.
The money, which totaled 45 percent of the cost of the $400,000 project, was furnished with an assurance from the City of Ontario it would be used to construct a facility that will continue to be devoted to public library purposes until such time as it is replaced by a new facility.
“Given this assurance, it would appear that the building needs to continue to be used as a public library, unless a different facility were to be built or leased for the Ontario Library District,” Scheppke said in the letter.
“We also have the verbal opinion of the State of Oregon Attorney General, who concurs with Mr. Scheppke,” Blankinship read.
Blankinship requested a quick closure to the issue, which would allow the library district to move forward with its June 30 deadlines.
The board also discussed a planned public forum, which is slated to involve the City of Ontario and the Ontario City Public Library District. At the Ontario City Council meeting Tuesday night, Ontario City Recorder Tori Barnett asked Ontario Mayor Joe Dominick if he had any specific date for the meeting planned. Dominick replied he and other council members would have to consult their schedules. Dominick also said Tuesday night that the public forum should occur within the next two weeks.
After the Ontario City Public Library District meeting, board members said they planned to attend this meeting.
“We’ll be there with bells on,” Jones said.
Erlebach said he believed the meeting would be a good one.
Mr. Savala wrote on Mar 4, 2009 12:47 PM:
Since being here I have watched many businesses close including a mall, observed what appeared to be the demise of both the aquatic center and the library of which both their existence today are tenuous at best.
What is apparent to me and many others both those who speak and those who do not is that the city government at large seems not to care, save that their names are in print associated with the appearance of action.
I voted for change after doing the best research available to me as a new citizen of Ontario. It appears my vote was wrong.
When we have an economy such as we have with little to offer our youth by way of education and activities the fault lies with the judgment of the people who voted in the present government. So if it is my fault then I must try to correct it.
City Council, why are you attempting to pick pocket the people you serve through this proposed Library Tax? Is it not provide monies for your self interests? To say it goes to the general fund is laughable and demeaning to those of us who realize what is meant by the general fund by which you mean a black hole of unaccountability.
I wonder why their is no YMCA or such like place for our families and youth. Why are so many businesses refused entrance? Are you afraid of competition and growth to the over rated and inferior products you provide the citizenry?
I speak for many when we thought that having a few business men on the city council would be good for growth of the city. Alas, you have proven yourselves charlatans and unworthy of the public trust you now have.
Citizens, if such a tax should pass there should be an account set up for a community center in which the funds go so as to build it or back a private interest in said endevour. In such manner the people still retain control of the money taxed.
Forgive the length of my writing however, Ontario is a great city with much potential but we are losing the ability to harness the potential through inept and corrupt leadership. We can do better. We must do better! Our future generations depend on decisions we make today! "