Big auto bailout may hit snag
Some Republican lawmakers appear to be lukewarm over proposed deal
Thursday, December 11, 2008 10:13 AM PST
| |
| Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., (center), accompanied by (from left), Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., Sen. Jon Ensign, R-Nev., Sen. David Vitter, R-La., and Sen. Jim DeMint, R-SC, speaks to reporters on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, to discuss the auto bailout. |
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate’s top Democrat called for a vote on the $14 billion auto industry rescue package as early as Thursday afternoon while the White House lobbied for votes, arguing that the economy can’t stand massive new layoffs.
‘‘We have danced this tune long enough,’’ Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid declared at midmorning.
He said he hoped for separate votes Thursday on compromise legislation backed by Democratic leaders and the White House, and a Republican version.
If not, the Nevada Democrat said, senators will have a test-vote Friday morning to force a final up-or-down vote within days.
Amid determined opposition to the rescue package from many members of President George W. Bush’s own Republican Party, White House press secretary Dana Perino said that Bush and other administration officials would be pressing hard Thursday to turn around skeptical senators. Speaking not long after the Labor Department reported new applications for jobless benefits at the highest level in 26 years, Perino told reporters : ‘‘We don’t think the economy can sustain it.’’
But the bill stands on very shaky grounds, nevertheless, in a bailout-weary Congress, and deputy press secretary Tony Fratto acknowledged that ‘‘there’s some explaining to be done.’’
Republicans are directly challenging Bush, arguing that any support for the domestic auto industry should carry significant concessions from autoworkers and creditors and reject tougher environmental rules imposed by House Democrats.
The House approved the plan late Wednesday on a vote of 237-170. It would infuse money within days into cash-starved General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC. Ford Motor Co., which has said it has enough cash to make it through 2009, would also be eligible for federal aid.
Supporters cited dire warnings from GM and Chrysler executives, who have said they could run out of cash within weeks, and concerns that a carmaker collapse would erase tens of thousands of jobs and jolt an already bleak economy.
Democrats and the Bush White House hoped the Senate would vote on the legislation as early as Thursday. But based on concerns raised by GOP senators — and a still-uncertain level of support even among Democrats — they had a lot of work to do.
A leading Senate Republican opponent said he cannot back spending $14 billion of taxpayer money on a plan that would call for a restructuring of the industry, but which fails to detail just how that would be accomplished.
‘‘I think that is putting the cart before the horse and isn’t responsible in terms of tax dollars,’’ Sen. David Vitter of Louisiana said on CBS’s ‘‘The Early Show.’’
Said Fratto on CNN: ‘‘A lot of members of the Senate have questions, on both sides of the aisle, about the strength of the so-called auto czar. We think this auto czar will have very strong, sweeping powers, and we think that’s reflected in the legislation. So we’re going to keep talking to them (senators). The president and other members of the administration will be reaching out to Republican senators this morning.’’
The measure’s murky outlook reflected the difficulty of approving another federal financial rescue on the heels of the deeply unpopular, $700 billion Wall Street bailout, as the clock ticks down on the current Congress and Bush’s influence is at a low ebb.
Even Republicans representing states with automobile plants said the proposal was far from ideal. Sen. Kit Bond, R-Mo., whose state is home to five auto plants, said he wanted to see changes. Sen. George Voinovich, R-Ohio, said the bill lacked the necessary Republicans to pass the Senate.
The measure would create a government ‘‘car czar,’’ to be named by Bush to issue the loans, empowered with the ability to yank back the loans and force the carmakers into bankruptcy next spring if they fail to cut quick deals with labor unions, creditors and others to restructure their businesses and become viable.
Opposition wasn’t limited to Republicans.
Democratic Sen. Max Baucus of Montana is opposing the measure because of a provision to bail out transit agencies that were involved in transactions now considered unlawful tax shelters.
Under the House-passed bill, the carmakers would have to submit blueprints on March 31 to the industry overseer showing how they would restructure to ensure their survival, although they could be given until the end of May to negotiate with the government on a final agreement.
The automakers initially asked Congress for $25 billion, then returned two weeks later to plead for as much as $34 billion. But with the White House refusing to dole out new spending for the Big Three, congressional Democrats agreed to use an existing program that was to help carmakers retool their factories to make more fuel-efficient cars.
That fund yielded only $15 billion in emergency loans, and when negotiators agreed to leave some money in the environmental program, the amount fell to $14 billion.
Democrats agreed to scrap language — which the White House had declared a deal-breaker — that would have forced the carmakers to drop lawsuits challenging tough emissions limits in California and other states. But they kept a provision to force the automakers to abide by those states’ limits — a kind of consolation prize for environmentalists, who already were livid at the raid of the fuel-efficiency program.
Senate Democrats unveiled a nearly identical measure that omitted the requirement, but that bill still faced long odds.
The Bush administration is expected to work with President-elect Barack Obama’s team on choosing the industry czar. The overseer would have say-so over any major business decisions by the automakers while they were taking advantage of federal aid, with veto power over any transaction of $100 million or more.
The measure also would attach an array of conditions to the bailout money, including some of the same restrictions imposed on banks as part of the $700 billion Wall Street rescue. Among them are limits on executive compensation, a prohibition on paying dividends and requirements that the government share in future profits and taxpayers be repaid before any other shareholders.
Also included in the bill is an unrelated pay raise for federal judges.
