Weather Magnet

Opinion
Print this story  |  Email this story  |  [+] Text Size [-]  

Our opinion: Failure should not be an option on bond



No doubt the supporters of the latest Ontario School Bond effort are probably dejected after the measure failed by a narrow vote Tuesday.

A certain amount of regret is normal, but it is already time to look to the future and prepare to place a bond measure before voters again next spring.

To an extent, there exists a certain amount of uncertainty regarding why this latest bond measure failed.

After all, this time bond supporters utilized a board of local residents to develop a viable plan, and then a large amount of time was spent to gain public input regarding the best plan. In short, this time supporters of the school bond did exactly what they should have done to involve and educate the public on this important issue. And yet it failed.

The vote tally showed the loss was a narrow one, but there is no escaping the fact that outside factors — such as the state of the economy — surely played a large role in the failure of the bond.

Still, supporters should be heartened by the fact the bond failed narrowly this time. Voters by a large margin scuttled the previous bond attempt.

Now, though, those who worked so hard for this latest school bond measure must reevaluate, seek more input from the community and then find a way to get the bond back on the ballot for the next election.

That may seem like a tall order, and, in a way, it is. Still, showing the surrender flag now would be a mistake. The infrastructure problems the Ontario School District faces are not going to go away. They exist and are only going to grow worse.

This time the bond measure failed by such a narrow margin that to walk away from the entire effort would be a mistake.

Those in support of the bond measure must find out why this time — after doing exactly what the public demanded regarding the overall plan — it failed.

The plan was the right one. Perhaps the timing was not. At any rate, it’s time to get started on the process to bring the measure before voters again.

The sooner the better.




Comment Blog - Note: All Comments Subject To Approval


TERMS OF USE

Those who post comments are accountable for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they furnish. While we encourage writers to utilize this service on our Web site, we also strongly suggest they treat it as public forum where good taste counts. We reserve the right to decline for approval objectionable material from these blogs.

Writers that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments - such as racists language, threats or comments unrelated to the story - will not be approved for the blogs. Also, entries that are unsigned or "signatures" by someone other than the actual writer will not be approved.

While writers can still post anonymously, we strongly suggest that they do not do so.

Opinions, guidance and other information expressed in Argus Observer story blog comments and on the Argus Observer blogs represent the individuals' own views and not necessarily those of the Argus Observer. The Argus Observer furnishes this type of forum and does not endorse and is not accountable for statements or advice from anyone other than an designated Argus Observer spokesperson.


(optional)
   

All Newspaper Ads
Place a classified ad

Community Calendar
November 2009
S M Tu W Th F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30

» This Week's Events
» Submit an Event
Click to View All Events

Business Directory
Find a business near you
Business Type

OR Business Name

Web Search
Google
 

Find out about our RSS feeds and what they are.

Copyright © 2009 Argus Observer - www.argusobserver.com. All rights reserved. | Unathorized reproduction is prohibited.