Weather Magnet

News
Print this story  |  Email this story  |  [+] Text Size [-]  

Plaintiffs in Old School case reach settlement
City sought legal barriers against local merchant



Ontario — A civil lawsuit filed by the city of Ontario against a local merchant was settled out of court earlier this month.

The city delivered a civil complaint against Victoria Miller, who owns the local business Old School, in December. City officials asserted Miller knowingly sold drug paraphernalia to be used for a controlled substance.

In the suit, the city asked for a civil fine of $10,000  — payment of the city’s legal costs and an injunction prohibiting Miller from selling, delivering or possessing drug paraphernalia.

 The settlement injunction filed July 1 stipulates Miller is forbidden from selling, delivering or possessing any product knowing it will contribute to drug use.

“Mrs. Miller agreed to follow the law, something we all have to do anyway,” Vale attorney Brian Zanotelli, who represented Miller, said.

According to Malheur County Circuit Court documents, Miller is no longer allowed to sell what are known as spice grinders, separation gins or sifters. However, she will be allowed to deplete her stock of 48 metal grinders as long as she sells them before the end of the year.

 Miller is allowed to deplete her inventory of Cannabis Culture and High Times magazines but only if those copies are sold before the end of the year.

Miller is also allowed to continue selling bongs, since those devices can be used to consume tobacco. She will also be allowed to continue to sell hookahs, which Ontario Police Chief Mike Kee, who signed the document, said are only used to consume tobacco.

“We went as far as the law would allow us to go,” Kee said. “In Oregon, we have a weak law. If people want a law with more teeth, they should take it up with their legislature.”

City Attorney Larry Sullivan said it was in the city’s best interest to settle the court case when it did.

The city gained at least one chance to settle the judicial proceeding in January when Zanotelli filed a motion to dismiss the case. Zanotelli’s motion to dismiss the case was rejected. Miller, in the request to dismiss the case, asked the city be compelled to pay her legal costs.

“I sell high-end glass tobacco pipes, rolling papers for people to make their own cigarettes and decorative cloth posters,” Miller said in her January declaration. “Everything I sell is legal and is specifically intended for legal use. I would not sell anything knowing it would be used illegally. I just want to run my business and contribute to my community as a taxpayer and good citizen.”

“It’s an expensive process with an uncertain outcome,” Sullivan said this week regarding the court case.  

Sullivan said any person involved in a civil action is aware of this fact, no matter how confident they are in their side of the case.

Zanotelli agreed the settlement was prudent.

“It’s a lot better than butting heads for a week in trial,” he said.

Zanotelli said he found fault with witnesses the city spoke to before the settlement. One of those witnesses, Krystal Priester, Parma, asserted she witnessed Miller talk with customers numerous times about using Old School’s products in conjunction with marijuana, but never with tobacco. She also said Miller did not ask customers for their medical marijuana cards, and she did not train her employees to do so.

“The city crawled into bed with a former felon, a former employee,” Zanotelli said.

Zanotelli said Priester had stolen property from Miller and could have a vendetta against Miller.

The trial was originally slated to begin Monday but was canceled after the settlement.

Other stipulations from the settlement include the fact Miller is not allowed to advertise the sale of drug paraphernalia or any controlled substance.

“If you look at the injunction it will spell it out,” Zanotelli said. “She couldn’t say ‘come to my store and get illegal products,’ which she wasn’t doing anyway.”

Kee asserted undercover officers had visited the establishment inquiring about purchasing items to do illegal drugs.

“If someone said ‘I want to make some meth, what do you got?’ she would have to say ‘get out,’ ” Zanotelli said.

If Miller were to sell drug paraphernalia, it would result in a payment of no less than $2,000, or no more than $10,000 per violation.

“The amount is not intended as a penalty,” court documents said. “But as damages to the plaintiff.”

Miller was also compelled to donate $1,500 to the Malheur County Drug Court within 30 days of the judgment.

Kee said the amount of attorney fees gained in the case were minimal, with Sullivan receiving payment for his work with the case only when members of City Council were deposed by the defense.

“The district attorney provided an attorney,” Kee said. “They work for us. They work for the public. No charge for them. The city also deposed Ms. Miller and had to pay for a transcriptionist. We paid for that. Other than that, there was no cost.”

Zanotelli would not offer a final number on his services.

“I know how much my bill is,” he said. “But I’m not going to tell you that.”

Kee said Ontario took the amount of money it would cost taxpayers into consideration before filing the lawsuit.  

“From a police department standpoint,” he said, “we’re very happy about this.”

Zanotelli expressed much of the same opinion.

“Now she gets to go about her business,” Zanotelli said, “just like the rest of us.”

Miller opted not to comment on the judgment.




Comment Blog - Note: All Comments Subject To Approval

to A Dad wrote on Aug 2, 2008 11:14 AM:

" And I'm sure you're a closet drinker too. Anything to keep the focus on an herb that hasn't ever done anything to anyone. But alcohol is perfectly fine right? Nobody ever dies or commits criminal acts on the booze, right? That's what I thought....fool. "

JIM P. wrote on Aug 2, 2008 10:55 AM:

" I SEE THE SAME DEFENSE COMING UP HERE. LAUGHING MY A** OFF. WAY TO GO DAD, YOU UN-ORIGINAL GUY YOU! LOL... ENLIGHTEN YOURSELF IF YOUR REALLY A DAD CAUSE YOUR KIDS WILL BE IF NOT ALREADY ARE IN A SOCIETY WHERE IT IS A ACCEPTIBLE DRUG SO YOU BETTER EDUCATE THEM THAT IT IS THE DEVIL AND TELL THEM IT WILL MAKE THEM STUPID, AND THAT THERE IS NOTHING GOOD FROM IT. BUT WHENT HEY ASK YOU IF YOU SMOKED IT TELL THEM THE TRUTH. DO NOT TLET YOUR INGNORANCE BLIND OUR CHILDREN. "

Mike Kee wrote on Aug 1, 2008 9:16 PM:

" I would encourage those of you that have not made up your mind on this issue, especially parents to check out a great web site that talks about drug use. Sign up for the news letter. Be sure and go to the virtual tour of the brain and pay attention to the effects that marijuana has on the prefrontal cortex of the brain. This part of the brain does not develop until an individual reaches an age into the mid twenties. The prefrontal cortex is responsible for judgement and reasoning, as well as decision making. The address is http://www.theantidrug.com/drug_info/mjmh_virtual_tour.asp "

A Dad wrote on Aug 1, 2008 11:31 AM:

" wow, you pro marijuana people and your silly post just prove what the DRUG has done to your brain. Thanks for proving our point. "

JIM P. wrote on Aug 1, 2008 10:09 AM:

" MAYBE WE SHOULD ARM ALL THE ANI-CHANGE PERSON(S) WITH SUN GLASSES AND A HEADPHONES AND SEND THEM TO CANADA'S TRANS - HIGHWAY. MAYBE THIER CRAZIES COULD SHED A LITTLE LIGHT ON SOME OF YOU. "

To Sam Again wrote on Jul 31, 2008 7:03 PM:

" You really are out of the loop, and quite ignorant. It is people like you who blame EVERYTHING on an herb that does absolutely NO harm to ANYONE. I bet you're a closet drinker, and want the attention focused on anything other than alcohol. Go get a little more educated on the subject before you bring your nonsense to the attention of others. "

Valed Reference wrote on Jul 31, 2008 6:28 AM:

" Sam,

Actually Congress is on the verge of decriminalizing marijuana in a bi-partisan bill. Your "reefer madness" viewpoint is fading, despite the "super-grass" propaganda. "

JIM P. wrote on Jul 31, 2008 6:26 AM:

" AND THAT IS THE ALL TO COMMON WAY TO PUT DOWN ANYONE WHO SUPPORRTS THIS MOVEMENT. CAN YOU BE MORE ORIGANAL PLEASE. I WOULD HAVE TO SAY ANYTIME ANYBODY THAT IS CORNERED ON THE SUBJECT USES PHRASES LIKE "QUIT DRINKING THE BONG WATER" OR "TAKE ANOTHER PUFF" OR SOMETHING THAT SHOWS YOU ARE UN-EDUCATED ON THE ISSUE. YOU PROBABLY DID NOT EVEN LISTEN TO THE SONG I REFERED TO. SO YOU MIGHT DRINK... YOU MIGHT SMOKE... I AM NOT SAYING LETS JUST LEGALIZE IT WITHOUT REGULATION, BUT THE POLITICS ARE JUST SO CORRUPT IN OTHER AREAS AROUND RURAL COMMUNITIES, THAT WE MIGHT AS WELL LEGALIZE IT CAUSE THE OTHER THINGS PEOPLE GET AWAY WITH IS A LOT WORSE THAN SITTING AT HOME AND SMOKING A "J" "

Larry wrote on Jul 30, 2008 7:03 PM:

" One of my old schools is torn down juss sayin' "

Sam wrote on Jul 30, 2008 2:38 PM:

" And you, my friend, are clearly out of the loop. You're fighting under the flag that 95 percent of America's college students carried in 1973. Things are different now, because growing dope has gone from being an agricultural occupation to a laboratory project. The LEGALIZE MARIJUANA flag is tattered and torn--like your brain will be if you continue to be a consumer/patron of the bong shop. "

JIM P. wrote on Jul 30, 2008 1:17 PM:

" --SAM--
YOU MUST BE AN IDIOT. THE RISKS ARE ALL THE SAME FROM THE 70'S. JUST BECAUSE YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE HIGHER THC CONTENT WEED DOES NOT MEAN THAT IT IS NOT MELLOW. THE MORE THE THC THE MORE MELLOW. EVERYTIME I RUN OUT I DO NOT THINK TO MYSELF "WHO CAN I ROB" OR "WHAT CAN I STEAL" TO GET MORE. FIRST OFF BEING HIGH MAKES PEOPLE MELLOW (LAZY) SO NO VIOLENT CRIMES ARE BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE HIGH. I UNDERSTAND THAT PEOLPE BEING CAUGHT DOING STUPID STUFF BLAME WEED CAUSE THEY DO NOT WANT TO TAKE RESPONSABILITY FOR THIER OWN ACTIONS. SECOND OFF, THINGS (DRUGS, CRIME) WERE HAPPENING A LOT LESS IN THE 70'S, AND WOULD HAPPEN A LOT LESS IF THE GOVERNEMENT WOULD FOCUS THIER POWERS TO GETTING ALCOHOL ILLEGAL. ALTHOUGH THERE ARE SET BACKS TO SMOKING WEED, THERE ARE A LOT MORE SET BACKS FROM DRINKING ALCOHOL. TAKE A PUFF AND CHILL OUT SAM. EDUCATE YOURSELF MORE ON MARIJUANA TO SEE THAT THERE ARE NOT CHEMICALS INTRODUCED IN NATURAL WEED, OUR METHODS OF GROWING HAVE JUST IMPROVED. AS FAR AS DOWNTOWN IS CONCERNED MAYBE THE CITY OFFICIALS COULD MAKE IT CHEAPER TO START A BUSINESS ON OREGON STREET. OR MAYBE CATER TO SOME OF THE BIGGER STORES THAT USED TO BE ABLE TO THRIVE THERE. JUST BECAUSE A HEAD SHOP IS THE HIGHLIGHT OF DOWNTOWN DOES NOT MEAN THAT OUR DOWNTOWN IS SUFFERING. SAM, DO NOT KNOCK IT UNTIL YOU HAVE TRIED IT. ALL INTERESTED MAYBE SHOULD LISTEN TO BEN HARPERS "BURN ONE DOWN" SONG AND APPLY IT TO REAL WORLD THEORY. "

To Sam wrote on Jul 30, 2008 7:44 AM:

" Get real pal; maybe you should sign up for at least one class....anyone. You must be an idiot for tokin' the fake stuff by the way, everyone knows that the actual doesn't have any "detrimental" affects. It's all political here. "

Sam wrote on Jul 29, 2008 3:45 PM:

" Wow. This is a segment of the community not often heard from. If your knowledge on the risks and hazards of marijuana-smoking isn't newly up-to-date you should sign up for a class. The mellow "weed" of the 70's no longer exists. ANYTHING we can do to keep this new toxic, chemically-laden sh** out of the hands (or pipes) of our residents should be done. And that includes making literature which supports this sub-culture unavailable. Downtown is starved for business, but this business is detrimental to all concerned. "

Exiled wrote on Jul 25, 2008 4:56 PM:

" Yeah, let's focus our tax dollars on getting rid of the REALLY dangerous stuff, like shopping bags! "

JIM P. wrote on Jul 24, 2008 8:44 AM:

" I SWEAR, TAKE OFF THE BLIND FOLD AMERICA. OUR DOLLAR FINALLY FALLS INTO LINE WITH THE WORLD ECONOMY AND EVERYONE FREAKS OUT. OUR POLITICS TAKE ADVANTAGE OF US NOT VOTING, AND MAKE US PAY FOR IT IN UNCONSITUTIONAL WAYS. SO TAKE THE LAW AS IT IS AND TAX US FOR SOMETHING WE DO NOT MIND PAYING TAXES ON. TELL ME PEOPLE WONT BUY THEM FOR WHATEVER THE PRICE. IF IT WERE LEGAL? PEOPLE WOULD NOT HAVE ANY PROBLEM WITH PAYING FOR IT. STATE RAN AGENCIES ALREADY CONTROL MOST OF WHAT IS PUT ON THE STREETS ALREADY. "

Reefer madness wrote on Jul 22, 2008 9:11 PM:

" Jim P., you have just helped me make up my mind as to whether the prolonged use of marijuana kills brain cells. Rock on dude "

JIM P. wrote on Jul 22, 2008 9:20 AM:

" SO BARRNES AND NOBLES SELLS THE ABOVE MENTIONED MAGAZINES. CANNIBIS CULTURE AND HIGH TIMES. REGULATION DOES NOT MEAN MARSHAL LAW. WHAT IS OUR COMMUNITY COMING TO IF A PERSON CANNOT LIGHT UP A JAY OR A PIPE AND SMOKE? WHY IS IT THAT THE PEOPLE HERE ARE STUPID. I PACK OF JOINTS PACKAGED LIKE CIGGARETTES COULD SELL FOR $50.00 IF IT WERE LEGAL. NEED MONEY GOVERNMENT? TAX US! "

Larry wrote on Jul 19, 2008 2:01 PM:

" Woa Jim P. Quit drinking your bong water, slow down, and take a deep breath. The paranoia will soon pass! "

Valed Reference wrote on Jul 19, 2008 8:27 AM:

" "Miller is allowed to deplete her inventory of Cannabis Culture and High Times magazines but only if those copies are sold before the end of the year."

This is an egregious and total misuse of government. We have a First Amendment. To force someone not to sell or display a printed product is a criminal act, if we believe the Constitution to be law. To solve any problem, all sides must be available and all points of view aired. When government steps in to short circuit that process, no matter what the problem is, the solution becomes more difficult and obscure. Far from halting the taking of controlled substances, the government has added to the problem, rather than worked toward a solution because they have violated the spirit of the First Amendment, which is intended to allow the free flow of information necessary to solve the problem. "

AverageJoe wrote on Jul 19, 2008 5:22 AM:

" Guessing here but, It would be a different story if Miller had a liqueur license and was putting money into the city coffers. "

Exiled wrote on Jul 18, 2008 3:25 PM:

" Hey, let's ask the high school students where they get all their stuff! "

JIM P. wrote on Jul 18, 2008 2:57 PM:

" I WENT THERE AND SEEN A SIGN FORBIDDING ANYONE ASSOCIATED WITH THE PRIESTERS TO ENTER. I THINK THAT THEY ARE THIEFS. AND FOR THEM TO NARK IS REALLY BAD CAUSE OF THEIR BUSINESS ASSOCIATES. GOOD LUCK WITH THAT CRYSTAL AND LEVI. LOSEERS! "

JJ wrote on Jul 18, 2008 11:00 AM:

" I have been in Old School, and I had no problem with it. I think the whole idea of a law suit against them is ridiculous. Shouldn't we focus our tax dollars on getting rid of the "hard" drug problems like meth and cocaine instead of attempting to bring down a business? Downtown needs all the business it can get. "


TERMS OF USE

Those who post comments are accountable for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they furnish. While we encourage writers to utilize this service on our Web site, we also strongly suggest they treat it as public forum where good taste counts. We reserve the right to decline for approval objectionable material from these blogs.

Writers that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments - such as racists language, threats or comments unrelated to the story - will not be approved for the blogs. Also, entries that are unsigned or "signatures" by someone other than the actual writer will not be approved.

While writers can still post anonymously, we strongly suggest that they do not do so.

Opinions, guidance and other information expressed in Argus Observer story blog comments and on the Argus Observer blogs represent the individuals' own views and not necessarily those of the Argus Observer. The Argus Observer furnishes this type of forum and does not endorse and is not accountable for statements or advice from anyone other than an designated Argus Observer spokesperson.


(optional)
   

Classifieds
Place a classified ad

Community Calendar
January 2009
S M Tu W Th F S
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

» This Week's Events
» Submit an Event
Click to View All Events

Business Directory
Find a business near you
Business Type

OR Business Name

Web Search
Google
 

Find out about our RSS feeds and what they are.

Copyright © 2009 Argus Observer - www.argusobserver.com. All rights reserved. | Unathorized reproduction is prohibited.