Weather Magnet

News
Print this story  |  Email this story  |  [+] Text Size [-]  

Daniels still interested in top city slot
Ontario airport manager selected as an alternate by elected leaders



Ontario Municipal Airport Manager Alan Daniels looks over a set of plans in his office Friday. Daniels was one of three local candidates to apply for the Ontario city manager position, but he was selected as one of the alternates.
ONTARIO - While the Ontario City Council appears to have opted for five other city manager candidates in its search, Ontario Municipal Airport Manager Alan Daniels said he thinks he would make a good candidate, as well, for one of the city’s top slots.

Daniels was one of three local candidates to apply for the city manager position — once held by Scott Trainor who departed last fall — and although he was not one of the top five candidates selected for final interviews by the council, he is one of three alternates.

Initially, Daniels said, he had no intention of applying for the city manager’s position after Trainor left. However, when he was approached by a number of different people in the community who recommended he apply for the position, Daniels said he considered the idea after discussing the matter with his wife, who approved.

He said, while the City Council has selected five other candidates as their finalists, he thinks he is a good option for them to consider, as well, and has no doubt he could do the job well and be an asset to the city.

Daniels said, because of his experience managing the airport — where he garnered a number of grants for critical improvements — his knowledge of the community and its issues after living here for almost 45 years along with his leadership and management training he received in the U.S. Air Force and his experience trouble-shooting in his past private ventures, he thinks he is well qualified to assume the duties of city manager, even if he doesn’t have any previous city managing experience and his education consists of a bachelors degree in communications rather than a masters in public administration.

“It’s not rocket science,” Daniels said, adding he thinks the city leaders and management need to return the focus of what the city is supposed to do for its residents. He said city residents purchase services from the city that they can’t otherwise purchase themselves, such as water, sewer, emergency services and parks. Residents, he said, expect a return for their investments — a higher standard of living.

He said for the city to become more prosperous, its government needs to present a stable front to the community and interested developers. Daniels said people want a mature, stable, responsive city government. He said residents and developers need to feel comfortable when doing business in a city, and they get turned off by instability and infighting. The key is to allow for multiple points of view without letting the arguments turn personal.

“You don’t want to get where there’s no dissent because you don’t get good solutions,” Daniels said.

He said, while he thinks he is a good, capable candidate for the city manager position, he will not hold it against the City Council should members not choose him, nor will he not establish a good working relationship with whomever the council does choose.

He said, like him, the City Council is working for one goal — improving Ontario, and the only difference between any of the members is they just have different ideas of what needs to be done to achieve that goal. Daniels said he can accept whatever decision is made by the council, and it won’t effect his job at the airport or his interest in improving Ontario. Ontario Mayor Joe Dominick said he has no doubt Daniels has some qualities that would benefit a city manager, which is why he made it so far in the consideration process. In fact, he said, the City Council directed Prothman Company, the consulting firm hired to aid in the process, to interview the top local candidate in its call backs because the council wanted consideration given to local people as well as others.

“Mr. Daniels has some interesting qualities as a leader that kept him as an alternate,” Dominick said. “He also has some good qualities in the number of grants he has received for the city of Ontario. He has some unique information about his application that kept his interest with the council as an alternate.”

Ontario City Councilman Dan Cummings said, for him, it came down to a matter of experience when the council made its final decisions for the top five candidates. Both he and Dominick said the council was not told which candidates to select by Prothman Company. Instead, he said, council members made those decisions themselves, although Cummings said Prothman offered opinions on each of the candidates. In Daniels’ case, Cummings said, he felt, by himself, Daniels needed a little more experience to be considered. Cummings said, with all the turnover the city has experienced and the current vacancies in positions, such as public works director, he feels the city needs a manager where the learning curve won’t be as steep. The city, he said, needs somebody with the experience to step in and take over without a long training period.

“Alan’s a super-good man, and I kind of wished he could have met all the qualifications,” Cummings said, adding, could it be arranged somehow, he thinks Daniels would be an ideal person for an assistant city manager. Then, Cummings said, should the position come open again, the city would have somebody ready and capable to step in.

Care to comment on this story? Go to www.argusobserver.com and post a blog.




Comment Blog - Note: All Comments Subject To Approval

Larry wrote on May 16, 2008 8:00 AM:

" Busted! Get over it! At least I have the courage to use my first name and you know exactly who I am as I do you. Since that is the case, when you are appointed to fill the vacant seat, I will publicly hold you accountable for the statements you have cowardly blogged in here. Your selection will indeed conclude the hostile takeover of the City Government. Then we will have TWO right wing nuts in Council. Go for it! Then you can advertise your business alongside the city logo like your buddy Joe does. Smart Very Smart "

To Get Over It wrote on May 15, 2008 1:11 PM:

" Funny you ask people to "get educated" when you yourself can't even spell "lose" as in to suffer a loss as opposed to "loose", the word you used.

As far as Mr. Daniels: Get over it dude. You didn't get the gig. Go get more grants for the Airport. "

to get over it joe or one of his buds wrote on May 15, 2008 8:48 AM:

" where is the proof? millions you say??? wow nothing says that in budget records, public works records or any records. To openly slander and tell ABSOLUTE lies with no facts is liable. You are a joke and bitter, cowardly person who hides under the guise of these blogs. YOU GET OVER IT AND DO THE RESEARCH, just writing crap does not make it true. "

Larry wrote on May 15, 2008 8:37 AM:

" get over it? Please enlighten us? if you know and assuming you are an elected council member, public official, or friend of.....you are a crook too! It' amazes me how people claim to "know" yet don't enlighten the public. Let's assume the king and his cronies "know". Are they doing what they were elected to do by not going public with these so called facts. Come on KING you can do it. Help define the word rape when it comes to millions of dollars. For the Mayor and his cronies, my definition of rape is when a previous PW director and his buddies have PW workers working out at the golf course and on the depot while neglecting infrastructure desperately needing work. Remember the "big hole" near NW 6th Avenue and North Park a few years back? Yup. Half the street opened up and left that way while the PW crew was working on golf course improvements.

Remember the time it took to upgrade the traffic signal near Sterling. Yup put on hold while the crews were working on the golf course.

The Depot? Much of it done by PW crew.

All done before Steve and all labor paid for by Public Works funded dollars of which was illegal and which was before Scott, Steve and such.

But hey! Tween the Argus and Joe Dominick the Scott and Steve were made out like the bad guys while the whole time, they were doing what they were hired to do and that was NOT kissing A.. of council members and Mayor. I will get over it when the mayor publicly admits HE was wrong or quits letting his right wing nut cronies call the shots. Who runs this town?

Scott a good ol boy? I doubt that very much. "

Tom wrote on May 15, 2008 7:58 AM:

" To bad we don't use the same process to select our Mayor I am sure Mr. Duminick would of not even made the alternate list with his low IQ and and lack of experience and personality. "

get over it wrote on May 14, 2008 5:50 PM:

" Oh how you cry when your "good ole boy" doesn't make the cut! Thousands of us cannot wait for the day that the "scott comparison" ends. How long till you realize how much bad that crook did to Ontario? How long till you realize how bad the good ole boys raped the city of Ontario? Probably forever. "Scott was perfect, never made a mistake." Check the budget boys, you will see the mistakes. His best bud Steve has cost the city millions! Scott has cost the city millions! If the "good ole boy" Alan had made it to the top, how much more would we loose? Probably at least another couple millions! Wake up, do some research you might just get educated. "

whatever wrote on May 14, 2008 1:23 PM:

" You're dirtier than all of the rest Harry! Mind your business fool.... "

Dirty Harry wrote on May 14, 2008 8:33 AM:

" To those who continually make allegations that past employees have lied without giving the specifics are losers. Please do not make Public statements of wrong doing if you are not prepared to back them up with facts, come and make my day. "

Alan Daniels wrote on May 14, 2008 8:24 AM:

" There is obviously much more to this than what appears. I was encouraged by friends to apply as it was felt that I had much to offer the city. The city council seriously considered what I had to offer and decided to go with someone who has current city manager experience. Considering the current situation it makes sense to me and was not opposed to the decision. There are a few errors in some of the comments. I do not currently have any employees at the airport as I have to do it all to keep within budget, but over the years I have been responsible for several HUNDRED employees. I have been a police chief, fire chief, both city and rural, and was responsible for the ambulance service. In private business I have be directly responsible for up to 115 employees at one time. I have been on the board of directors of a publicly held company, have been a CEO and general manager of a company. My current summer job in Alaska also includes supervisory and management responsibilities. I think one of the things that had some people interested is that when I took over the airport I made it operationally self funding and have brought in about 4 million in grants and grant matches for improvements. I think I may be able to double that this year with any luck. I believe it was felt that I could use those skills to benefit the city. I still think there is a way to do it in a role that is complimentary to the city manager position. We need civil discourse and real solutions. We are all held together by the simple fact that this is our home. My intentions were honorable and my motivation genuine. I offered, the city council decided there was a better option, so we need to move on. "

give him a shot wrote on May 14, 2008 8:23 AM:

" I don't see why he would be any lesser of a candidate than anyone else; he has served the community for many years, and seems passionate about the citizens, unlike the fools coming in from other states, areas, etc. Ontarion is slowy on the downfall, and if the people who have been there through the good and bad don't step up now anf take charge of the city, then it's going to become a desolate joke! "

Larry wrote on May 13, 2008 4:40 PM:

" It bothers me to hear people drag A Alan through the mud. I had the pleasure of working for Alan years ago and can tell you that he knows much more than given credit for. Now if the community is looking for someone to use Ontario as a stepping stone to pad a resume, Alan is not your man. As far as credibility, enthusiasm, integrity and hometown values, I can guarantee you Alan has a lot more to offer the community than that idiot Mayor hands down. It's to bad HE didn't run for Mayor. Although not a finalist, I would say getting to the alternate in line says quite a bit. Good luck Alan "

Larry wrote on May 13, 2008 4:33 PM:

" So Mr. Trainor's a liar eh? Do you have facts to back up your allegations?

Come on! Enlighten us! "

Joe dont know Jack wrote on May 13, 2008 12:10 PM:

" We have a unqualifed Mayor, might as well have un underqualifed City Manager at least we would have a pair to draw to. What a joke for an article Jessica, you must of been higher than a kite when you wrote this. "

Daniels Supporter wrote on May 13, 2008 9:55 AM:

" Mr. Daniels did not sound of sour grapes, but a common sense individual who is correct when he states it doesn't take a rocket scientist to be the City Manager. What it takes is someone w/ guts to be honest w/ the council and citizens unlike Mr. Trainor who lied numerous times to cover his butt then leaves under the guise of a better job opportunity w/ more pay.
I don't know Mr. Daniels personally, but based upon his comments in the article, he sounds to be a very qualified person for the job and he lives here. The so called top candidates may have more direct qualifications in governmental manaqement, but their time spent at their present jobs before applying for Ontario's makes me wonder how long they would stay here before looking for another job w/ more pay and less conflict.

My vote is for Mr. Daniels as he has a proven interest in Ontario with his longevity in the community and his common sense approach to providing services to the community at a reasonable cost. "

former employee wrote on May 12, 2008 5:29 PM:

" Frankly and know disrespect to Mr. Daniels but this quack idea as an alternate is a joke. Also this article shows disrepect to those who are qualified and have applied for this position, additionally this is a low blow to the City's previous City Manager, (scott trainor). Mr. Daniels has NO employee's, never has, and absolutely no experience as a City Manager. This is just another piped idea from Joe so he can have someone to be his puppet. Why is this article even in the paper??? Mr. Daniels isn't even a candidate, couldn't the argus wait and do their homework and writing after this weeks interview process of the QUALIFIED candidates. "

What wrote on May 12, 2008 11:07 AM:

" So, Do we have an opening for an assistant City Manager?? Or are we creating a "new" job and providing on the job training experience for unqualified people?? How is this going to save the city money? What are the qualifications of an alternate and how do we get on this list? "

wow wrote on May 11, 2008 11:31 AM:

" Sounds like sour grapes on Mr. Daniels part. Move on and apply for a job you are actually qualified for, not one you think you are qualified for. "


TERMS OF USE

Those who post comments are accountable for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they furnish. While we encourage writers to utilize this service on our Web site, we also strongly suggest they treat it as public forum where good taste counts. We reserve the right to decline for approval objectionable material from these blogs.

Writers that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments - such as racists language, threats or comments unrelated to the story - will not be approved for the blogs. Also, entries that are unsigned or "signatures" by someone other than the actual writer will not be approved.

While writers can still post anonymously, we strongly suggest that they do not do so.

Opinions, guidance and other information expressed in Argus Observer story blog comments and on the Argus Observer blogs represent the individuals' own views and not necessarily those of the Argus Observer. The Argus Observer furnishes this type of forum and does not endorse and is not accountable for statements or advice from anyone other than an designated Argus Observer spokesperson.


(optional)
   

All Newspaper Ads
Place a classified ad

Community Calendar
November 2009
S M Tu W Th F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30

» This Week's Events
» Submit an Event
Click to View All Events

Business Directory
Find a business near you
Business Type

OR Business Name

Web Search
Google
 

Find out about our RSS feeds and what they are.

Copyright © 2009 Argus Observer - www.argusobserver.com. All rights reserved. | Unathorized reproduction is prohibited.