Weather Magnet

Opinion
Print this story  |  Email this story  |  [+] Text Size [-]  

Our Opinion: NASA move on safety report is misguided



A decision by NASA to deny public access to an extensive survey of American commercial airline pilots regarding safety sends a troubling signal concerning transparency.

  The $8.5 million safety review consisted of phone interviews with more than 20,000 pilots over a four-year period.

  The Associated Press found out about the study and then sought the report, but the news agency was stymied because the agency said releasing the information would damage the confidence of the American public with airline safety and, potentially, hurt airline profits.

  At least on one level, the apparent honesty of the agency regarding its stonewalling is refreshing. In this day and age of the “war on terror” many government agencies, once agents of the people, simply shut off information streams with no explanation.

  Yet NASA’s honesty on why it will not release the information hardly makes up for its decision to withhold the data in the first place.

  When it comes to safety, especially regarding a subject like airlines, the American people have a right to know.

  The Associated Press was able — through an unnamed source — to discover that in the report pilots described more strikes by birds on airplanes and twice as many near mid-air collisions on U.S. Airlines than first thought.

  Hard data, though, on the subject is missing because of the NASA plan to hide the information. Which means the American people will not gain the opportunity to decide whether the airline safety situation is serious.

  The decision by the space agency to withhold the report is a wrong one.




Comment Blog - Note: All Comments Subject To Approval


TERMS OF USE

Those who post comments are accountable for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they furnish. While we encourage writers to utilize this service on our Web site, we also strongly suggest they treat it as public forum where good taste counts. We reserve the right to decline for approval objectionable material from these blogs.

Writers that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments - such as racists language, threats or comments unrelated to the story - will not be approved for the blogs. Also, entries that are unsigned or "signatures" by someone other than the actual writer will not be approved.

While writers can still post anonymously, we strongly suggest that they do not do so.

Opinions, guidance and other information expressed in Argus Observer story blog comments and on the Argus Observer blogs represent the individuals' own views and not necessarily those of the Argus Observer. The Argus Observer furnishes this type of forum and does not endorse and is not accountable for statements or advice from anyone other than an designated Argus Observer spokesperson.


(optional)
   

All Newspaper Ads
Place a classified ad

Community Calendar
November 2009
S M Tu W Th F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30

» This Week's Events
» Submit an Event
Click to View All Events

Business Directory
Find a business near you
Business Type

OR Business Name

Web Search
Google
 

Find out about our RSS feeds and what they are.

Copyright © 2009 Argus Observer - www.argusobserver.com. All rights reserved. | Unathorized reproduction is prohibited.