Weather Magnet

Local News
Print this story  |  Email this story  |  [+] Text Size [-]  

Most Ontario teachers backed bond effort



JESSICA KELLER

ARGUS OBSERVER

ONTARIO

In general, Ontario School District teachers supported the $30 million school bond venture voters scuttled last November.

Elementary and secondary education staff in the school district returned 199 responses for the bond survey generated by district officials to measure public support, or lack of, for the high school bond effort.

At the secondary school level, 64 staff members voted in favor of the bond election, 11 voted no, and 35 did not vote. At the elementary school level, 35 staff members voted in favor, 14 were opposed and 40 did not vote.

“It was pleasing to know the people who ‘walk the walk' thought we needed to upgrade the physical plant,” Ontario School Board member John Phillips said at the school board meeting in May.

Ontario School District Superintendent Dennis Carter said at the bond election's conclusion, school board members heard a large number of teachers did not vote in favor of the bond election. District officials wanted to know why that was, so staff was included in the survey campaign.

Carter said every staff member was asked to complete a survey, even if they did not vote because they do not live within the school district and were not eligible.

Carter said those who did not vote were asked to fill a survey out as if they had, to gauge what their support was as well. Those who completed the survey were also allowed to fill out as many options that they agreed with in each of the categories.

Carter said it appears, teachers voted more in favor than what the rumors alluded to after the bond election.

“I, in general, think that teachers might vote closer to the general public than they did on this issue,” he said.

At the secondary school level, of those who either voted in favor or would have voted in favor of the bond, 73 said they supported the bond because they believe the current high school facilities are outdated and inadequate; 48 believed the students needed more space; 44 liked the idea of moving the middle school to the old high school site following renovation; and 43 believed students could be better served if everything were in one location.

Of those who did not support the bond at the secondary school level, 10 did not like the proposed location for the new high school; seven believed the cost was too high; four could not afford increased taxes; three did not believe there was a need; and two said they did not have sufficient information to make a good decision.

At the elementary school level, for those who voted in favor, 57 agreed the students needed more space; 36 believed the current high school facilities are outdated and inadequate; 24 liked the idea of moving the middle school to the old high school site; and 21 believed students could be better served if everything were in one location. Of those who voted “no” or would have voted “no” at the elementary level, 16 did not like the proposed location, 14 believed the cost was too high, 10 did not believe there was a need for a new high school; seven could not afford the increased taxes and six said they did not have sufficient information to make a good decision. The school board will likely discuss the survey results again before making any decision on where to go from this point, Carter said.




Comment Blog - Note: All Comments Subject To Approval


TERMS OF USE

Those who post comments are accountable for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they furnish. While we encourage writers to utilize this service on our Web site, we also strongly suggest they treat it as public forum where good taste counts. We reserve the right to decline for approval objectionable material from these blogs.

Writers that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments - such as racists language, threats or comments unrelated to the story - will not be approved for the blogs. Also, entries that are unsigned or "signatures" by someone other than the actual writer will not be approved.

While writers can still post anonymously, we strongly suggest that they do not do so.

Opinions, guidance and other information expressed in Argus Observer story blog comments and on the Argus Observer blogs represent the individuals' own views and not necessarily those of the Argus Observer. The Argus Observer furnishes this type of forum and does not endorse and is not accountable for statements or advice from anyone other than an designated Argus Observer spokesperson.


(optional)
   

All Newspaper Ads
Place a classified ad

Community Calendar
November 2009
S M Tu W Th F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30

» This Week's Events
» Submit an Event
Click to View All Events

Business Directory
Find a business near you
Business Type

OR Business Name

Web Search
Google
 

Find out about our RSS feeds and what they are.

Copyright © 2009 Argus Observer - www.argusobserver.com. All rights reserved. | Unathorized reproduction is prohibited.